Is Your Pension Working as Hard as You Are?

Guest blogger: Ben Williams

Working with self-employed solicitors, consultants and legal professionals, we often see the same challenge. Retirement planning is something that people know is important, but it’s rarely urgent. Between managing clients, running a practice and keeping on top of compliance, pensions can easily be pushed to the bottom of the list.

It’s understandable. Legal professionals spend their careers helping others plan ahead and manage risk, yet many don’t apply that same level of planning to their own financial future.

One of the most common things we come across is professionals with several pension pots built up over the course of their career. They may have a workplace pension from when they were employed, another from a previous firm and perhaps a personal pension they’ve been contributing to since becoming self-employed. Often these pensions haven’t been reviewed for many years and, in some cases, people aren’t even sure exactly what they have.

While having multiple pensions isn’t necessarily a problem, it’s important to understand whether they’re still appropriate for your circumstances. Investment performance, charges and retirement objectives can all change over time, and a pension that suited you ten years ago may not be the best fit today.

Another common misconception is that retirement planning is simply about accumulating the biggest pension pot possible. In reality, it’s about creating a plan that can provide the level of income you’ll need throughout retirement. For self-employed professionals, whose income may fluctuate from year to year, this often requires a more tailored approach.

Pensions also remain one of the most tax-efficient ways to save for the future. Making regular contributions, particularly during profitable years, can form an important part of wider financial planning while helping you build long-term financial security. Regular reviews can also ensure your pension strategy continues to reflect changes in your business, personal circumstances and retirement goals.

Having worked as a financial adviser for more than 10 years, I’ve had the privilege of helping individuals, business owners and legal professionals build their pensions and work towards the retirement they want. One thing I’ve learned is that no two clients are the same. The most effective retirement plans are those that are tailored to an individual’s objectives, rather than relying on a one-size-fits-all solution.

The legal profession is built on careful planning, attention to detail and preparing for the future. Applying that same mindset to your own retirement can make a significant difference. Taking the time to review your existing pensions, understand where you stand and put a clear plan in place today can provide greater confidence for tomorrow.

After all, your pension should be working just as hard as you do.

About the author

Ben Williams

Ben Williams is a Wealth Management Partner at True Potential Wealth Management, helping individuals and businesses protect, grow and preserve their wealth through tailored financial planning. Ben takes the time to understand each client’s goals and provides clear, practical advice, giving them the confidence to make informed financial decisions and build long-term financial security.

Contact Ben

Interested in a confidential chat?

If you are considering outsourcing your legal cashiering, or just want to find out how it works, our team is here to help.

Contact us
Back to Blogs
Cashroom provides expert outsourced account services for law firms including legal cashiering, management accounts and payroll services. Our mission is to fee lawyers from the complexities of legal accounting by supporting the industry with accurate management information and allowing lawyers to do what they do best – practice law.

“I’ve been a client of Cashroom for over 10 years and couldn’t fault the service. When I started the firm, I had basic knowledge of compliance and bookkeeping but didn’t feel confident managing it myself. Cashroom took that weight off my shoulders and provided an invaluable resource I wouldn’t have been able to afford in-house.”

Mubasher Choudry
Mubasher Choudry
Mubasher Choudry Family Law Solutions

Technology, Integration, and The Future of Legal Finance

For many law firms, finance has traditionally sat in the background, often disconnected from the systems and processes that drive day-to-day legal work. However, this is becoming less sustainable. As firms look to improve efficiency, reduce risk, and gain better visibility over  performance, outsourced legal finance and the role of technology in legal finance are becoming more central to modern operations. By combining specialist support with connected systems, firms can streamline processes, reduce errors and focus on delivering value to clients. 

CEO of Cashroom, Chris O’Day explains that outsourced legal finance works best when it feels like a natural extension of the firm and not a separate function. 

Q. The Cashroom now works with more than 30 case and practice management systems. How crucial is seamless technology and integration to the future of outsourced legal finance, and to the experience firms receive?

A. Integration is absolutely central. If outsourced finance felt like a separate system bolted on at the side, it wouldn’t work. Our aim is that from the firm’s point of view, everything feels joined-up; matter data, client ledgers, banking, reporting and approvals all talking to one another. 

We’ve invested heavily in integrating our portal with the leading case and practice management systems, as well as with the banking network via open-banking connections and payment-verification tools. That means transactions can flow securely and accurately between systems, with far fewer manual touchpoints and far less scope for error. 

For firms, the benefits are very tangible. Fee-earners can see the financial position of matters in real time. Cashiers don’t have to rekey data between platforms. Approvers can authorise payments from wherever they are, with the right controls around them. And partners get clearer management information, faster. 

 Seamless integration is what will allow us to bring more automation and AI into the process without compromising control. If the data is structured and connected, you can start to automate the routine tasks – posting, matching, exception-flagging – while keeping humans focused on judgement, review and client communication. 

“Good technology isn’t a nice-to-have; it’s what turns outsourced finance from a service into part of a firm’s core infrastructure.” 

Q. Looking ahead, how do you see legal finance operations evolving over the next decade, especially with AI, automation, and regulation all accelerating at once?

A. I think we’ll see three big shifts.

First, the routine mechanics of legal finance will become increasingly automated. Posting transactions, matching payments, flagging anomalies and generating standard reports are all tasks that lend themselves to smart automation and, in time, AI. That won’t remove the need for humans, but it will change their role, from data entry to oversight, exception handling and interpretation. 

Second, firms will demand better, more real-time insight. Rather than waiting for month-end packs, they’ll want live visibility of cash, WIP, lock-up and matter profitability, across the entire firm and down to individual teams. That requires clean, connected data across practice management, banking and finance platforms – which is where integrated outsourced models can add real value. 

Third, regulation will continue to evolve, often in response to technology itself – whether that’s around open banking, new payment methods, or emerging risks like sophisticated fraud. The direction of travel is clear: regulators expect firms to be proactive, well-informed and able to evidence strong control environments, particularly around client money. 

In that world, I see outsourced legal finance becoming even more embedded. It’s difficult for individual firms to keep pace with advances in technology, regulatory change and talent development on their own. Partnering with a specialist that sits at the intersection of those trends, and spreads the investment across hundreds of firms, is a pragmatic way to stay ahead. 

My hope is that, ten years from now, legal finance will feel less like a constant source of pressure and more like a strategic asset that helps firms grow with confidence. 

Building a Smarter, More Resilient Finance Function 

The future of legal finance is clearly tied to technology, integration, and smart, connected processes. Firms that embrace these changes will not only improve efficiency and accuracy, but also gain the real-time insight and resilience needed to navigate growth, regulatory change, and operational complexity. 

Outsourced legal finance, when seamlessly integrated into a firm’s systems, becomes part of the firm’s core infrastructure than just a back-office function. It frees teams to focus on higher-value work, empowers partners with clear, actionable data, and ensures client funds are managed safely and efficiently. 

By investing in integrated technology and specialist outsourced support, law firms can turn legal finance from a source of stress into a strategic advantage, building a foundation that supports sustainable growth, confident decision-making, and long-term success. 

Discover how outsourcing and integrated technology can transform your legal finance function. 

Learn how Cashroom helps law firms streamline processes, improve accuracy, and gain real-time insight, freeing your team to focus on clients, growth, and strategy. 

About Chris O’Day

Chris O’Day is a Chartered Accountant, having qualified at Deloitte and has had a significant impact at Cashroom over the years since joining in 2014. After joining Cashroom as a Management Accountant, his extensive experience in legal accounting saw him become Cashroom’s Client Services Director in 2017 – gaining significant insight as to what is valuable to clients and to the legal industry, before taking on the CEO role in 2021 to drive the next phase of Cashroom’s growth. 

Chris finds endless opportunities and has a key focus on challenging the status quo in order to drive continuous improvement across the business and the services Cashroom provide to the Legal Sector. Chris believes that being client-centric is key to any service business – understanding what lawyers want and need and ensuring Cashroom deliver the best customer experience that is efficient, compliant and risk-free.

Learn how Cashroom can help your firm build a finance function that’s both secure and scalable.  

Contact Us

Interested in a confidential chat?

If you are considering outsourcing your legal cashiering, or just want to find out how it works, our team is here to help.

Contact us
Back to Blogs
Cashroom provides expert outsourced account services for law firms including legal cashiering, management accounts and payroll services. Our mission is to fee lawyers from the complexities of legal accounting by supporting the industry with accurate management information and allowing lawyers to do what they do best – practice law.

“I’ve been a client of Cashroom for over 10 years and couldn’t fault the service. When I started the firm, I had basic knowledge of compliance and bookkeeping but didn’t feel confident managing it myself. Cashroom took that weight off my shoulders and provided an invaluable resource I wouldn’t have been able to afford in-house.”

Mubasher Choudry
Mubasher Choudry
Mubasher Choudry Family Law Solutions

Financial Red Flags Every Managing Partner Should Watch For

For many managing partners, the focus of the working day is naturally on clients, people and keeping the firm moving forward. If you’re lucky, you might find some time for business development too.

Outside of work, life is rarely any quieter. Whether its school runs and family commitments, caring responsibilities for ageing parents, or simply juggling the demands of everyday life, there’s a lot competing for your attention.

With so much going on, it’s understandable that the financial management of the firm can become something that sits quietly in the background. You review the management accounts at monthly partner meetings, year-end accounts are prepared, compliance requirements are met, and you trust that everything is under control.

The reality, however, is that financial problems rarely appear overnight.

They tend to develop gradually through small inefficiencies, delayed decisions or processes that no longer reflect the way the firm operates. By the time they become visible, they may already be affecting profitability, cash flow or regulatory compliance.

The challenge is recognising the warning signs early.

When Cash Flow Feels Tighter Despite a Healthy Workload

One of the most common frustrations for law firms is the disconnect between how busy the practice feels and how much cash is actually available.

A full diary and a growing caseload do not automatically translate into healthy cash flow. Work in progress may remain unbilled for longer than expected, invoices may not be issued promptly, or outstanding debts may continue to increase. Meanwhile, payroll, supplier invoices and other operating costs still need to be met.

Many firms find themselves asking the same question: “If we’re so busy, why doesn’t the bank balance reflect it?”

Regular cash flow forecasting helps identify these issues before they become problematic. Rather than simply reviewing what has already happened, firms can understand what is likely to happen over the coming weeks and months, allowing them to make informed decisions with greater confidence.

Your Financial Reports Arrive, But They’re Already Out of Date

Management information is only valuable if it helps you make decisions.

If partners are reviewing reports several weeks after month end, they are often reacting to information that is already out of date. Instead of driving decisions, reporting becomes little more than a compliance exercise.

Law firms generate significant amounts of financial information every day. Billing, client receipts, supplier payments and payroll all contribute to a constantly changing picture. Timely, accurate reporting enables partners to spot trends early and respond before small issues become larger problems.

Good reporting should do more than present numbers. It should explain what those numbers mean, highlight unusual movements and provide genuine insight into the firm’s financial performance.

Increasing Lock-up Quietly Restricts Growth

Lock-up is discussed regularly within legal finance, but its impact is often underestimated.

Every pound tied up in unbilled work or unpaid invoices is money that cannot be invested elsewhere in the business. As lock-up increases, firms may delay investment in technology, recruitment or business development despite appearing profitable on paper.

Bills may not be raised promptly, matters may remain open unnecessarily, or credit control may become inconsistent during busy periods. Individually these delays seem manageable, but collectively they can place significant pressure on cash flow.

Regularly reviewing lock-up and understanding where delays occur allows firms to release working capital without increasing fees or taking on additional work.

Compliance Should Never Become an Afterthought

Financial compliance cannot simply become a focus in the weeks before an audit or regulatory inspection.

Maintaining accurate financial records, robust internal controls and timely reconciliations should form part of everyday operations. Strong financial governance protects client money, reduces risk and provides confidence that issues will be identified before they become significant.

Where finance teams are stretched or processes rely heavily on manual intervention, reconciliations are more likely to be delayed, and discrepancies can take longer to identify.

The strongest firms build compliance into their day-to-day processes rather than treating it as an administrative exercise at month end.

“Outsourcing acted as an important risk management tool. Partnering with experts like Cashroom, reduced the risks of errors and ensured strong compliance processes from day one.” – Stacy Campbell | McKee Campbell Morrison Solicitors

Manual Processes Become Hidden Barriers

As firms grow, finance teams often inherit additional responsibilities without receiving additional resource.

Processes that worked perfectly for a smaller practice can quickly become inefficient as transaction volumes increase. Payment processing, reconciliations, reporting and administration all require more time, while expectations around accuracy and compliance remain unchanged.

Over time, highly skilled finance professionals can spend most of their day completing repetitive administrative tasks instead of providing the financial insight that partners genuinely need. It’s also one of the reasons experienced finance professionals can become disengaged and eventually leave, creating further operational challenges.

Reviewing workflows and making better use of technology or specialist legal finance support allows finance teams to focus on higher-value work while improving efficiency and reducing operational risk.

Perhaps the biggest warning sign of all is when financial performance consistently comes as a surprise.

Partners should understand how the business is performing throughout the year, not just when annual accounts are prepared.

If profitability is lower than expected, overheads continue to rise without explanation, or cash flow regularly causes concern despite a healthy pipeline of work, these are all indicators that greater financial visibility is needed.

Good financial management isn’t simply about producing reports. It’s about providing timely information that enables better decisions, supports future planning and gives firms confidence to navigate an increasingly complex legal landscape.

Looking Ahead

Financial resilience is built through consistent processes, accurate reporting and proactive oversight. Most financial challenges begin as small operational issues that, if left unresolved, gradually become much larger business risks.

By recognising these early warning signs, firms can strengthen financial performance, improve compliance and put themselves in a stronger position for sustainable growth.

At Cashroom, we work exclusively with law firms across Scotland and the rest of the UK, helping practices strengthen financial processes, improve compliance and gain greater visibility over their financial performance.

As an approved supplier of the Law Society of Scotland, we understand the specific regulatory requirements facing Scottish law firms. Whether supporting sole practitioners or multi-office practices, our experienced legal finance professionals work alongside existing teams to deliver accurate financial management, robust compliance and the insight firms need to make confident business decisions.

Need Support with Legal Accounting?

Cashroom specialises in outsourced accounting services for law firms across the UK, helping firms stay compliant, efficient and financially informed.

Contact us
Back to Blogs
Cashroom provides expert outsourced account services for law firms including legal cashiering, management accounts and payroll services. Our mission is to fee lawyers from the complexities of legal accounting by supporting the industry with accurate management information and allowing lawyers to do what they do best – practice law.

“We have used Cashroom for many years, it’s a great system. Our firm is regularly instructed to support significant transactions – both in terms of the importance of deals, as well as their value. As a result, we need to be absolutely sure that we can rely and trust on our finance management partners to be able to administer fast, secure, and seamless transactions. We’ve never thought to look elsewhere as Cashroom have always been there for us.”

Sharon Needle
Sharon Needle
Needle Partners Limited

Choosing an Accountant for Your Law Firm

Lawyers are trained to practice law, not accounting, but poor financial management can have serious consequences for a firm’s performance.

From client account compliance to cash flow management, legal finance comes with strict regulatory requirements. Choosing the right accountant helps protect you firm, your clients and your professional reputation.

So, how do you choose the right accountant for your law firm?

Why Legal Accounting Expertise Matters

Legal accounting isn’t the same as standard business accounting.

Law firms must comply with the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) Accounts Rules, particularly when handling client money. This includes:

  • Keeping client money separate from office funds
  • Ensuring accurate, timely and fully reconciled client account records
  • Maintaining clear audit trails for all transactions
  • Preventing breaches that could lead to regulatory investigation

For example, even something as simple as a delay in reconciling client account transactions can create compliance issues if discrepancies are not identified and corrected promptly.

Incorrect handling of client funds can result in fines, intervention, reputational damage, or in serious cases, regulatory action against the firm or individuals involved.

This is why working with an accountant who specialises in the legal sector is essential. It ensures your financial processes are compliant, controlled, and aligned with regulatory expectations, while also maintaining the trust your clients place in you.

What to Look for in a Legal Accountant

1. Proven Experience in the Legal Sector

Not all accountants understand the nuances of legal finance.

A general practice accountant may be comfortable with small business bookkeeping, but legal finance requires specialist knowledge of client money rules, billing structures, and regulatory reporting.

Look for a provider that:

  • Works specifically with law firms
  • Understands your firm’s compliance requirements, whether that’s the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), Law Society of Scotland, or the Council for Licensed Conveyancers (CLC)
  • Has experience with your type of firm (e.g. conveyancing, litigation, family law)

A conveyancing-heavy firm will have high volumes of client transactions requiring frequent reconciliations, whereas a litigation practice may need more complex work-in-progress tracking and billing oversight.

Knowledge from a specialist legal accountant will understand these difference and tailor their approach accordingly.

2. Strong Compliance and Risk Management

Compliance is a critical part of your firms’ operations and goes far beyond simple box ticking.

Your accountant should:

  • Monitor compliance with SRA Accounts Rules on an ongoing basis
  • Carry out regular three-way reconciliations of client accounts
  • Identify unusual transactions or discrepancies early
  • Help ensure breaches are prevented, not just reported after the fact

If a client account is not reconciled promptly, a specialist accountant would flag this early and help resolve it before it becomes a compliance breach.

This proactive approach reduces regulatory risk and gives you confidence that your firm’s finances are being managed correctly.

3. Technology That Works with Your Firm

Modern law firms rely on technology to operate efficiently, from practice management systems to cloud-based accounting tools.

Your accountant should be comfortable working within your existing systems, rather than forcing you to change them.

Look for experience with:

  • Practice management systems such as LEAP, Proclaim, or Clio
  • Cloud accounting platforms like Xero or QuickBooks
  • Secure, real-time reporting and document sharing tools

For example, integration between your practice management system and accounting processes can significantly reduce manual data entry, improve accuracy, and speed up month-end reporting.

Cashroom, for instance, works system-agnostically and uses The Cashroom Portal to integrate with a firm’s existing systems, meaning firms can retain their current infrastructure while still accessing specialist legal accounting support.

4. Scalable Support as You Grow

As your firm grows, so will your accounting needs.

You may start with basic bookkeeping needs, but over time require more advanced support such as management accounts, payroll, credit control, and financial forecasting.

A strong provider should be able to scale with you by offering:

  • Flexible service levels that adjust to your firm’s needs
  • Additional support functions such as payroll and credit control
  • Strategic financial insight, not just transactional processing

A growing firm opening a second office may need consolidated management accounts across locations, along with clearer visibility of profitability by department or fee earner. Outsourced accounting provides access to a full team of specialists without the cost and complexity of building an in-house finance department.

5. Clear Reporting and Commercial Insight

A good accountant goes beyond reporting figures, providing clarity and insight into what they mean for your firm.

You should expect:

  • Regular, structured financial reporting
  • Cash flow forecasting and visibility of upcoming commitments
  • Profitability analysis by matter type, department, or fee earner
  • Clear commentary that explains what the numbers mean

Understanding that a department is highly active but low in profitability may highlight pricing issues, inefficiencies, or billing delays that need to be addressed. This level of insight enables better decision-making and supports sustainable growth.

Questions to Ask Before You Choose

Before appointing an accountant, ask:

  • Do you specialise in working with UK law firms?
  • How do you ensure compliance with SRA Accounts Rules?
  • What systems do you integrate with, and how does the process work?
  • What level of reporting and support will I receive?
  • How will your service scale as my firm grows?

The quality and specificity of the answers will quickly reveal whether the provider truly understands legal finance or offers a generic accounting service.

In-House vs Outsourced: What’s Right for Your Firm?

Many firms attempt to manage financial operations internally, often combining fee-earning staff with administrative or part-time finance roles.

While this may work in the short term, it often creates challenges such as:

Outsourcing your legal accounting function offers a different approach.

It provides:

Final Thoughts

Choosing the right accountant is one of the most important decisions you’ll make for your firm.

The right partner will:

  • Ensure compliance
  • Improve financial clarity
  • Support your growth

The wrong one can lead to inefficiency, unnecessary risk and avoidable stress.

Taking the time to choose carefully now can make a significant difference to your firm’s long-term success.

Need Support with Legal Accounting?

Cashroom specialises in outsourced accounting services for law firms across the UK, helping firms stay compliant, efficient and financially informed.

Contact us
Back to Blogs
Cashroom provides expert outsourced account services for law firms including legal cashiering, management accounts and payroll services. Our mission is to fee lawyers from the complexities of legal accounting by supporting the industry with accurate management information and allowing lawyers to do what they do best – practice law.

“We have used Cashroom for many years, it’s a great system. Our firm is regularly instructed to support significant transactions – both in terms of the importance of deals, as well as their value. As a result, we need to be absolutely sure that we can rely and trust on our finance management partners to be able to administer fast, secure, and seamless transactions. We’ve never thought to look elsewhere as Cashroom have always been there for us.”

Sharon Needle
Sharon Needle
Needle Partners Limited

Cashroom Becomes a Clio EMEA Gold Certified Partner

Leading legal finance provider strengthens strategic partnership with Clio to help law firms improve efficiency, compliance, and financial visibility.

Cashroom is delighted to announce that it has become Clio’s first EMEA Gold Certified Partner, marking a significant milestone in the long-standing relationship between the two organisations. 

The achievement recognises Cashroom’s expertise in legal finance and its commitment to helping law firms maximise the benefits of legal technology through the seamless integration of Cashroom’s specialist accounting services and Clio’s leading cloud-based practice management platform. 

As one of the UK’s leading providers of outsourced legal cashiering, management accounts, payroll and financial services for law firms, Cashroom works with more than 300 firms across the UK, providing compliant, scalable finance support backed by innovative technology. 

The partnership between Cashroom and Clio enables law firms to streamline legal accounting processes, reduce administrative burden, improve compliance, and gain greater visibility over their financial performance. Through the integration between Clio and the Cashroom Portal, firms benefit from more efficient workflows, reduced risk of error, and access to real-time financial information. 

Emma O’Day, CMO of Cashroom, said: 

“Achieving Gold Certified Partner status with Clio is a fantastic milestone for Cashroom and reflects the strength of our relationship with the Clio team. We share a commitment to helping law firms embrace technology, improve efficiency, and build stronger, more resilient businesses. 

As legal practices continue to grow, firms need trusted partners who can help them navigate both operational and financial challenges. By combining Clio’s market-leading practice management platform with Cashroom’s specialist legal accounting expertise, we are helping firms create a more streamlined, secure and scalable future.” 

The recognition further strengthens Cashroom’s position as a trusted technology and finance partner for law firms and reinforces its commitment to investing in integrations and partnerships that deliver practical value to clients. 

Myles McLaren, EMEA Channel Lead at Clio, said: 

“Cashroom has demonstrated a strong commitment to helping law firms succeed through technology, operational excellence and financial expertise. We are delighted to recognise their achievements as our newest EMEA Gold Certified Partner and look forward to continuing to support law firms together.” 

The announcement comes as increasing numbers of law firms look to modernise their operations, improve compliance, and create more efficient ways of working. Together, Cashroom and Clio provide firms with an integrated solution that supports growth while reducing risk and administrative complexity. 

Readers can learn more about Cashroom’s certification and partnership with Clio here. 

Interested in a confidential chat?

If you are considering outsourcing your legal cashiering, or just want to find out how it works, our team is here to help.

Contact us
Back to Blogs
Cashroom provides expert outsourced account services for law firms including legal cashiering, management accounts and payroll services. Our mission is to fee lawyers from the complexities of legal accounting by supporting the industry with accurate management information and allowing lawyers to do what they do best – practice law.

“We have used Cashroom for many years, it’s a great system. Our firm is regularly instructed to support significant transactions – both in terms of the importance of deals, as well as their value. As a result, we need to be absolutely sure that we can rely and trust on our finance management partners to be able to administer fast, secure, and seamless transactions. We’ve never thought to look elsewhere as Cashroom have always been there for us.”

Sharon Needle
Sharon Needle
Needle Partners Limited

SRA Effective Supervision Guidance

Guest blogger: The Compliance Office

The SRA’s updated Effective supervision – Guidance was finally published on 12th June 2026.

This follows the Court of Appeal’s much-heralded ‘conduct of litigation’ judgment in the Mazur case in March (see some of our previous thoughts here). By way of a reminder, the Court of Appeal concluded that it is lawful for an unauthorised person to carry out work amounting to the ‘conduct of litigation’ under the Legal Services Act 2007 (LSA) as long as they are doing so ‘for and on behalf of an authorised individual’ under their genuine and effective supervision, including providing ‘proper direction, management, supervision and control’. The Court however, left the detail of what effective supervision looks like to legal regulators, such as the SRA. The much-anticipated guidance from the SRA has now landed!

The Law Society updated its practice note on ‘Mazur and the conduct of litigation’ in April. It has taken the SRA longer to produce its updated guidance due to it working with other representative bodies, including the Law Society and CILEX Regulation, as well as government departments,
the Legal Aid Agency and the Law Centres Network to ensure a joined-up approach.

The SRA’s guidance has been significantly expanded (from 9 pages to 24 ) to deal with the impact of the Court of Appeal’s decision on supervision arrangements for non-authorised staff (i.e. non-solicitors or non-authorised barristers/ legal executives), including a complete rewrite of the section specifically addressing the ‘conduct of litigation’, as well as taking the opportunity to update its thoughts on supervision more
generally.

SRA Guidance – key points/changes

Whilst there is no substitution for reading the guidance itself in full (and we very much encourage this), here are the main points we have picked out:

  • It does not create any new standards or requirements beyond those in legislation or the SRA’s current standards and regulations.
  • It summarises the Court of Appeal’s conclusions in relation to the conduct of litigation and supervision (but, slightly oddly, doesn’t mention the Mazur case by name), emphasising that the supervising authorised person retains all responsibilities in relation to the tasks performed by the unauthorised person and the professional principles flowing therefrom.
  • The key themes remain the same (but have been expanded):
    o The need for supervision – to comply with SRA standards and regulations and the LSA
    o Appropriate supervision arrangements – these remain risk-based with the acknowledgement that there is no single model of supervision. The idea being that the intensity of supervision will depend on the complexity of the legal matter, the likely impact on clients if things go wrong, and the experience of the person carrying out the work.
    o Conducting supervision – a supervisor needs sufficient contact with the supervisee and must see enough work to identify patterns of risk, as well as having effective knowledge of the matters being worked on.
    o Ensuring supervision is effective – including proactive steps so that supervision arrangements are clear and understood.
  • Who can supervise? Supervisors do not have to be partners or those with line management responsibilities, but who should be a supervisor should be decided taking a risk-based approach, taking into account the proposed supervisor’s expertise, skills, availability and ‘whether they are able, in practice, to exercise proper direction, management, supervision and control over the work being delegated with confidence’.
  • Appropriate supervision arrangements
    o Supervisors should establish when and how they will check the supervisee’s work – not necessarily just at the ‘final product’ stage, always remembering that when dealing with reserved legal activities (including the conduct of litigation), it is the authorised person who remains responsible for the work.
    o There are various good practice suggestions, including ensuring clarity about tasks being delegated, including to whom, and the expectations from both the
    supervisor and the supervisee, including the scope and limits of delegated authority, and including supervision discussions in performance reviews.
  • Do you have a speak-up culture? Whilst not new to the guidance, it is worth mentioning the (highly topical) reference to the importance of firm culture enabling staff to raise concerns and be supported if they are experiencing problems.
  • Document everything! Firms are expected to record their rationale when designing supervision systems and delegation arrangements, as well as supervisors/ supervisees being expected to keep records of supervision in action.
  • ‘Conduct of litigation’ section: This provides helpful guidance as to how and when tasks can be delegated to unauthorised people (commenting that the suggestions in this section can be applied to any supervision situation), and how to demonstrate the required supervision, including having proportionate audit and quality assurance measures to promptly address any issues or breaches identified.
  • What amounts to ‘conduct of litigation’? An annex has been added to tackle this tricky issue, given the lack of a definitive list, and the rather vague definition in the LSA (issuing proceedings before any court in England & Wales; the commencement, prosecution and defence of such proceedings; and the performance of any ancillary functions in relation to such proceedings). The annex references the need for ‘professional judgement’, the fact that it will not include purely clerical or mechanical activities, and the list of issues the Court of Appeal grouped together as being unlikely to fall within the definition, namely:
o Pre-litigation work
o Giving legal advice in connection with court proceedings
o Conducting correspondence with the opposing party on behalf of clients
o Gathering evidence
o Instructing and liaising with experts and counsel
o Signing a statement of truth in respect of a statement of case
o Signing any other document that the CPR permits to be signed by a legal representative, as defined by CPR Part 2.3.
  • When is a criminal offence committed? Interestingly, the guidance makes no direct reference to this (pursuant to section 14 LSA, namely, when a non-authorised person conducts litigation or does so under the supervision of a non-authorised person) other than to include a section on the possible defence to such criminal proceedings, nor
    the Court of Appeal’s clarification that having an ineffective system of supervision in place will be a matter for regulators rather than the criminal courts. However, the
    Enforcement section now covers what the SRA will do if they discover that an unauthorised person is in fact taking responsibility for tasks that amount to the conduct of  litigation (perhaps with an authorised person allocated to the matter in name only). The Law Society guidance is the place to turn for more detail about the criminal side of things.
  • Case studies: The original 2 case studies have now been joined by a further 4, mainly focussing on High Volume work (including looking at the ratios of supervisors to
    supervisees and the benefit of having clear systems and controls in place overseen by a solicitor), but also looking at the thorny issue of significantly experienced, but nonauthorised staff, (such as legal executives without practising rights) having to be supervised by far more junior, but authorised, solicitors. Sadly, the guidance isn’t particularly enlightening as to how to deal with this senior/ junior situation, concluding simply that “this situation can be managed”
  • Additional sections: Specific sections have been added to address supervisors not authorised by the SRA and supervision of Artificial Intelligence-assisted work.

What was already there?

For those of you who haven’t read the SRA’s supervision guidance in a while, don’t forget it already included some helpful sections, including those addressing:

  • What checks supervision should involve
  • Face to face supervision and how to deal with remote, hybrid and agile working
  • Supervising work outside an employment relationship
  • Supervising trainees
  • Claims management activities, Immigration and Legal aid work

What does it all mean?

Effective supervision is a balance of professional judgement and robust systems. By clearly defining delegation, maintaining active oversight, and recording your supervisory rationale, you can ensure your firm remains compliant with the post-Mazur landscape and the SRA’s updated expectations, as well as your obligation to act in the best interests of your clients. Time to review your supervision arrangements!

About the authors

Jen Dunlop

Jen joined the Compliance Office in 2021 as a Senior Risk & Compliance Consultant, quickly making her mark with her deep regulatory expertise and practical, solutions-driven approach. Her leadership skills and commitment to excellence saw her promoted to Head of Compliance, before stepping into the role of Managing Director in April 2025.

Jessica Irwin

Jess joined the Compliance Office in 2023, bringing over two decades of legal and compliance expertise. She qualified as a Solicitor in 2000 and spent 19 years as a litigator at a leading, long-established Thames Valley law firm. In 2019, she transitioned into the role of Compliance Manager at the same firm, working closely with the COLP and MLRO/MLCO to drive best practice and ensure full SRA compliance.

Interested in a confidential chat?

If you are considering outsourcing your legal cashiering, or just want to find out how it works, our team is here to help.

Contact us
Back to Blogs
Cashroom provides expert outsourced account services for law firms including legal cashiering, management accounts and payroll services. Our mission is to fee lawyers from the complexities of legal accounting by supporting the industry with accurate management information and allowing lawyers to do what they do best – practice law.

“I’ve been a client of Cashroom for over 10 years and couldn’t fault the service. When I started the firm, I had basic knowledge of compliance and bookkeeping but didn’t feel confident managing it myself. Cashroom took that weight off my shoulders and provided an invaluable resource I wouldn’t have been able to afford in-house.”

Mubasher Choudry
Mubasher Choudry
Mubasher Choudry Family Law Solutions

Why Law Firm Profitability Is More About Finance Operations Than Fee Earning

Most law firm leaders instinctively focus on fee earning when they think about profitability. More billable hours, higher rates, increased utilisation and on paper, it all makes sense. 

But in practice, many firms reach a point where increasing fee earning no longer delivers proportional profit growth. The real constraint isn’t always revenue generation, it is operational capacity. 

 

Revenue Creation Is Visible, Profit Conversion Is Not 

Fee earning is highly visible in a law firm. Leaders can see utilisation rates, matter volumes, and billing targets. It is straightforward to measure and manage and naturally becomes the focus of performance discussions. 

What is often less visible is everything that happens after the legal work has been completed. Generating revenue is only the first step. Firms must also ensure that work is accurately recorded, billed promptly, collected efficiently and reflected in reliable financial reporting. A firm can be busy, win new clients and maintain strong fee income, but if the processes supporting those activities are inefficient, profitability can suffer. The difference between revenue generation and profit realisation is where finance operations play a critical role.  

 

The Silent Impact of Operational Friction 

Profit leakage rarely comes from one big problem. More often, it’s the result of lots of small inefficiencies that build up over time across a firm’s finance operations. 

Think about time recording. If it’s being entered retrospectively or inconsistently, there’s a greater chance that work is missed, undervalued, or simply forgotten about when it comes to billing. The same applies to invoicing. If bills are being produced manually or rely heavily on one person to keep things moving, delays can quickly creep in. And when reconciliations aren’t being completed promptly, or financial data is spread across multiple systems, it becomes much harder to get a clear picture of the firm’s cash position. 

Individually, these issues might not seem like a major concern. Most firms can work around them in the short term. The problem is that they rarely exist in isolation. Together, they slow down the journey from completed work to cash in the bank, putting unnecessary pressure on cash flow and reducing the firm’s ability to convert revenue into profit. 

That’s why some firms can appear to be performing well on paper, with strong fee income and busy teams, while still experiencing pressure on cash flow and profitability. 

 

Why Increasing Fee Earners Does Not Solve the Problem 

When profitability comes under pressure, the instinctive response is often to focus on increasing fee earner output. More fee earners, more billable hours, more revenue. 

Simple, right? 

Not always. 

The challenge is that increasing the volume of work coming through the firm only delivers results if the systems behind the scenes can keep up.  

As firms grow, billing becomes more complex. There are more matters to manage, more client requirements to navigate, more transactions to reconcile, and more compliance obligations to meet. Without the right processes in place, finance teams can quickly find themselves spending more time firefighting than supporting the business. Bills take longer to go out, cash takes longer to come in, and partners spend more time dealing with operational issues that distract from valuable management time. 

In some cases, firms can find that profitability becomes harder to maintain as they grow. Not because the fee earners aren’t performing, but because the infrastructure supporting them hasn’t kept pace. 

 

The Role Finance Operations Play in Profitability 

 At Cashroom, we often talk about finance operations as the bridge between work being done and profit being realised. 

Winning work and delivering great client service are obviously essential. But unless that work is accurately recorded, billed promptly, and collected efficiently, the financial benefit to the firm is reduced. That’s why finance operations have such a significant impact on performance. 

When processes are working well, firms benefit from quicker billing cycles, healthier cash flow, fewer write-offs, and more reliable financial information. Just as importantly, partners and management teams gain greater confidence in the numbers they’re using to make better strategic decisions. 

Effective finance operations also help firms identify trends earlier, manage resources more efficiently and maintain greater control over finance performance. 

In short, they provide the foundation that allows fee earning activity to deliver its full financial vale.  

 

The Scalability Challenge in Modern Law Firms 

One of the biggest challenges growing firms face is that financial complexity tends to increase much faster than expected. 

More clients and more matters don’t just create more work for fee earners. They create more transactions, more billing arrangements, more reporting requirements, and more opportunities for inefficiency to emerge. 

Many firms reach a point where processes that worked perfectly well a few years ago start to feel stretched. Month-end takes longer. Reporting becomes harder to produce. Teams spend more time managing exceptions and less time focusing on improvement. 

At that point, growth itself can start to create operational pressure. 

It’s not a lack of demand holding the firm back. It’s the ability to manage increasing financial complexity in a way that remains efficient, accurate and scalable. 

 

Looking at Profitability Differently 

For law firm leaders, this means profitability needs to be viewed through a wider lens than fee income alone. 

Of course, utilisation and revenue remain important. However, firms that consistently improve profitably are often those that pay equal attention to the systems, processes and expertise supporting fee earning activity.  

This is one of the reasons we’re seeing more firms review their finance functions and consider outsourcing elements of their legal accounting operations. The objective is not simply to reduce costs, but create a finance operation that delivers greater visibility, efficiency and control. 

By strengthening the finance infrastructure behind the business, firms can improve performance without placing additional pressure on fee earners.  

 

Sustainable Profitability Starts Behind the Scenes 

Fee earning will always be at the heart of a successful law firm. But sustainable profitability depends on much more than the number of hours recorded each month. 

The firms that achieve long-term success are usually those with strong operational foundations. They have finance processes that support growth rather than slow it down, provide accurate information when it’s needed, and ensure that completed work is turned into cash as efficiently as possible. 

Which is why one of the most valuable questions law firm leaders can ask isn’t simply, “How do we generate more work?” 

 It’s: “How effectively are we managing the work we already have?”

 The answer often reveals opportunities for improvement that have a much bigger impact on profitability than many firms expect. 

 

Looking to Improve Profitability Without Increasing Pressure on Fee Earners? 

At Cashroom, we help law firms strengthen and scale their finance operations, improving efficiency, reducing risk, and providing the financial foundat6ions needed to support sustainable growth. 

If you’d like to find out how we support law firms across the UK, we’d love to have a conversation.  

Interested in a confidential chat?

If you are considering outsourcing your legal cashiering, or just want to find out how it works, our team is here to help.

Contact us
Back to Blogs
Cashroom provides expert outsourced account services for law firms including legal cashiering, management accounts and payroll services. Our mission is to fee lawyers from the complexities of legal accounting by supporting the industry with accurate management information and allowing lawyers to do what they do best – practice law.

“We have used Cashroom for many years, it’s a great system. Our firm is regularly instructed to support significant transactions – both in terms of the importance of deals, as well as their value. As a result, we need to be absolutely sure that we can rely and trust on our finance management partners to be able to administer fast, secure, and seamless transactions. We’ve never thought to look elsewhere as Cashroom have always been there for us.”

Sharon Needle
Sharon Needle
Needle Partners Limited

The Quiet Wins: How Law Firms Build Success

Success in a law firm is not always about the big deals, the headline cases, or the awards on the shelf. More often, it is the quiet wins, the moments when systems work seamlessly, teams communicate effectively, and clients feel genuinely understood. 

 

Think about it. A client calls with a tricky question late on a Friday afternoon. Your team handles it calmly, accurately, and promptly. No fanfare, no drama. But that moment, repeated across dozens of clients and cases, builds trust and reputation far more reliably than any marketing campaign ever could. Over time, it is these consistent, small gestures that keep clients loyal, even when competitors try to tempt them with flashier promises. 

 

Internal processes, the ones that are often overlooked, can make or break a firm’s day-to-day life. Take, for example, client onboarding. Firms that have clear checklists, automated reminders, and standardised templates can bring a new client up to speed in a matter of hours rather than days. Staff feel less stressed, fewer errors happen, and clients feel like they are in competent hands. It may sound mundane, but smooth operations are the backbone of any successful practice. 

 

Then there is the human element. Technology, automation, and streamlined workflows are vital, but they do not replace empathy, curiosity, and the ability to listen. A solicitor who takes five extra minutes to explain a complex clause in plain language is doing more than providing legal advice, they are building confidence, loyalty, and trust. The same principle applies internally: a manager who checks in on a junior associate’s wellbeing, or a paralegal who flags a potential issue before it becomes a problem, contributes to a culture where excellence grows naturally. 

 

Sometimes it is also about spotting opportunities in the quiet moments. A team noticing recurring queries from clients might create a simple FAQ or guide. It is not revolutionary, but it saves time, reduces errors, and enhances client satisfaction. Another example is reviewing workflows to see where tasks repeatedly get held up. Perhaps invoices are delayed because one step is unnecessarily manual. Making a small change, such as automating reminders, using a portal for client approvals, or partnering with specialists like Cashroom to streamline account management can have an outsized effect on efficiency and morale. 

 

The lesson is clear. Look for the quiet wins in your firm. Invest in small improvements. Recognise the moments that do not make headlines but make a difference. Over months and years, those small, steady wins add up to lasting success. Firms that focus on the quiet, consistent, and human side of their work may not always make the front page, but they build the kind of reputation and resilience that sustains long-term growth. 

 

In short, success is often less about the spectacular gestures and more about the everyday decisions that keep the wheels turning smoothly, the team engaged, and the clients reassured. This is a strategy any firm can adopt at any time of the year, and one that pays dividends quietly, reliably, and lastingly. 

Interested in a confidential chat?

If you are considering outsourcing your legal cashiering, or just want to find out how it works, our team is here to help.

Contact us
Back to Blogs
Cashroom provides expert outsourced account services for law firms including legal cashiering, management accounts and payroll services. Our mission is to fee lawyers from the complexities of legal accounting by supporting the industry with accurate management information and allowing lawyers to do what they do best – practice law.

“We have used Cashroom for many years, it’s a great system. Our firm is regularly instructed to support significant transactions – both in terms of the importance of deals, as well as their value. As a result, we need to be absolutely sure that we can rely and trust on our finance management partners to be able to administer fast, secure, and seamless transactions. We’ve never thought to look elsewhere as Cashroom have always been there for us.”

Sharon Needle
Sharon Needle
Needle Partners Limited

Grow Your Practice with the Right Financial Partner

You’re three weeks behind on client account reconciliations. Again. 

Your office manager has just handed in their notice, and they’re the only person who really understands your client accounts. Meanwhile, your cash flow spreadsheet makes no sense, even though you billed £80,000 last month. Where did the money go? 

This scenario is all too common in law firms. You trained to practice law, not wrestle with reconciliations late on a Friday evening. Yet here you are, because your firm’s financial foundation impacts everything: taking on new clients, hiring solicitors, expanding offices, and, of course, ensuring you and your staff get paid for the work you do. 

Your law firm cashier is far more than someone who records transactions. They’re a strategic partner who can accelerate growth or can become your biggest bottleneck. The difference between a generalist bookkeeper and a specialist in law firm accounts can mean the difference between scaling confidently and facing regulatory scrutiny over client account management. 

Why Law Firms Need a Specialist Bookkeeper 

Your cousin’s bookkeeper, who handles the local businesses, might be great at bookkeeping, but they shouldn’t touch your client accounts. 

Legal accounting is highly specialised. Solicitors’ client accounts must comply with Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), the Law Society, and other relevant regulatory bodies, and mistakes can threaten your certificate to practice. 

 

Navigating the Compliance Minefield 

Client account regulations govern: 

  • How client funds are separated from office funds 
  • Handling of retainers and payments 
  • Complete documentation of every transaction 

HMRC has requirements for your business accounts, but the SRA adds another layer of complexity for client accounts. You need monthly reconciliations at minimum (daily is better), detailed audit trails, and accurate tracking of funds by client and matter. 

Accounting violations are a leading cause of SRA investigations and sanctions. Errors in client account management can result in fines, investigations, or restrictions on practising. 

 

For example, in 2023, the SRA commenced a forensic investigation into a law firm and found that the firm had not carried out proper three-way client account reconciliations for over six months, failing to address breaches of the SRA Account Rules. The investigation also revealed that the firm had not properly maintained its books dating back to 2018. As a result, the firm was ordered to pay a financial penalty of £11,550, plus costs of £1,350. 

A specialist law firm accountant or legal cashier knows these rules inside out. They understand that payments go into client accounts first, earned fees are transferred correctly to office accounts, and client funds cannot be “borrowed”  temporarily. Their expertise helps the firm remain fully compliant, avoiding penalties and regulatory issues like the example above. 

 

Beyond Basic Bookkeeping 

Law firms don’t operate like typical businesses. You deal with: 

  • Contingent fees 
  • Client disbursements 
  • Retainers with varying depletion rates 

Explaining this complexity to a generalist bookkeeper rarely ends well. 

Your law firm bookkeeping solution should track: 

  • Work-in-progress (WIP): Shows unbilled time accurately 
  • Aged receivables reports: Broken down by client, matter, and responsible solicitor 
  • Practice area profitability: Visibility into which areas generate revenue and which drain resources 

This is forensic-level financial management requiring specialist expertise. 

 

Common Challenges with In-House or DIY Bookkeeping 

We hear this frequently: 

“I don’t have time to keep up with accounting.” Partners spend weekends reconciling accounts instead of focusing on clients. 

“I’m not clear on all the accounting rules.” Awareness of gaps can prevent serious compliance breaches. 

“Managing staff is harder than expected.” Sick days, turnover, or mistakes can create costly problems. 

The Time Trap 

You charge £350 per hour yet spend hours weekly on bookkeeping that could be done at a fraction of the cost. That’s lost revenue and missed opportunities. Solo practitioners can feel this most acutely: trying to be the solicitor, rainmaker, and bookkeeper. Something must give, and its often financial management that slides, leaving you exposed during audits. 

 

Scaling Without Breaking Your Budget 

Hiring in-house can cost: 

  • Base salary: £35,000–£50,000 
  • Benefits & NI contributions: £5,000–£10,000 
  • Office space & equipment: £2,000–£4,000 
  • Training & CPD: £500–£1,500 

Total: £42,500–£65,500 annually for one person, without factoring in risk. 

Outsourced solutions flip this model. You can get a team of specialists for less than the cost of one in-house hire. Expertise that would cost six figures to recruit internally becomes accessible. Redundancy ensures financial operations never stop. With access to an entire team experienced in law firm accounting, knowledge doesn’t walk out the door.  

 

Overcoming “We’ve Always Done It This Way” 

Change can feel uncomfortable. Many firms hire in-house because it’s tradition. But technology, remote working, and streamlined processes now provide competitive advantages. Firms sticking to in-house models often hit a ceiling. One legal cashier can only handle so much before errors multiply and growth stalls. Perhaps you have a small team of cashiers in-house but who is managing them? Are their processes regularly reviewed? Do you know for sure that you 100% need 3 full time people in the team?  

 

Advantages of Outsourced UK Law Firm Bookkeeping 

Cost Efficiency 

Outsourced solutions typically cost up to 30% less than in-house staff while delivering superior results. No holiday pay, sick days, pensions, or office overhead. Services scale with your firm, seamlessly adjusting as your workload increases. 

 

A Team of Experts vs. One Generalist 

A solo bookkeeper cannot match the collective expertise of a team that has handled every scenario across multiple law firm accounts. 

 

Daily Reconciliations & Real-Time Insight 

Daily client account reconciliations, live dashboards for cash position, WIP, and receivables. Management accounting insights help you make strategic decisions. 

 

Risk Reduction & Security 

Secure portals, encrypted communications, and audit trails protect sensitive financial data. No more sending confidential information via email. 

 

Technology Integration 

Outsourced teams work with any accounting or practice management system you use. Fully SRA-compliant, integrated, and scalable. 

 

Choosing the Right Law Firm Bookkeeper 

 

Checklist for a specialist provider: 

  • Legal-Exclusive Focus: Only works with law firms 
  • Proven Track Record: Handles solos to larger firms, references available 
  • Secure Technology Platform: Not reliant on email, with audit trails and authorisation workflows 
  • System Agnostic: Experienced across multiple platforms 
  • Daily Processes: Client account reconciliations daily, not monthly 
  • Comprehensive Services: Bookkeeping, billing support, debt recovery, management accounting 
  • Transparent Communication: Clear onboarding, support, and response times 

 

Red Flags: 

  • Providers without references or case studies 
  • Reliance on email for financial data 
  • Inexperienced with UK legal account compliance 
  • Lack of Cyber Essential or equivalent security certification  
  • Only monthly reconciliations 
  • Pricing far below market 

 

Next Steps to Scalable Growth 

 

Accurate, compliant cashiering is the foundation for everything: hiring smartly, profitable expansion, sustainable growth, and long-term success. The right law firm cashier is an investment, not a cost. Reduce risk, improve cash flow, and free up capacity to focus on what generates revenue: practicing law. 

Partner with specialists like Cashroom handling hundreds of law firms every day. Stop worrying about client account reconciliations and start growing your practice confidently. 

Interested in a confidential chat?

If you are considering outsourcing your legal cashiering, or just want to find out how it works, our team is here to help.

Contact us
Back to Blogs
Cashroom provides expert outsourced account services for law firms including legal cashiering, management accounts and payroll services. Our mission is to fee lawyers from the complexities of legal accounting by supporting the industry with accurate management information and allowing lawyers to do what they do best – practice law.

“We have used Cashroom for many years, it’s a great system. Our firm is regularly instructed to support significant transactions – both in terms of the importance of deals, as well as their value. As a result, we need to be absolutely sure that we can rely and trust on our finance management partners to be able to administer fast, secure, and seamless transactions. We’ve never thought to look elsewhere as Cashroom have always been there for us.”

Sharon Needle
Sharon Needle
Needle Partners Limited

SRA client money consultation: Outcomes and implications for law firms

Guest blogger: Merete Poulsen, Kreston Reeves

The SRA has now published its consultation response on ‘protecting the client money that solicitors hold’, marking the latest step in its wider consumer protection review.

Having actively engaged with the consultation process through direct feedback to the SRA (see our full response to the SRA here) and ongoing dialogue with our clients, we set out below the key developments and their practical implications for law firms.

The SRA has confirmed that its immediate priority is to strengthen the current framework for safeguarding client money, rather than introduce fundamental structural change. While some longer-term reforms remain under consideration, the regulator is focused on delivering targeted, practical improvements in the near term. This pragmatic approach aligns with feedback from across the profession and our views that there are short term changes that can be implemented to improve consumer protection relatively quickly. Their confirmed changes can be split into two main categories.

1. Accountants’ report regime

One of the most impactful areas of change relates to the accountants’ report framework, which remains central to the SRA’s supervision of client money risks.

The SRA intends to introduce:

Submission of all accountants’ reports for non-exempt firms (not just qualified reports), giving the SRA a more complete view of compliance across firms.

Mandatory annual declarations by firms, confirming their status and key information related to the accountants’ report.

Fixed financial penalties for breaching requirements e.g. late/ non-submission

These changes are designed to address identified gaps in compliance, including instances where firms failed to obtain reports or submitted them late. Broadly speaking, the accountants’ report regime changes are in line with our own response, particularly surrounding improving visibility without creating a disproportionate burden.

For firms, this signals a move toward greater transparency and regulatory visibility.

2. Governance and internal controls

Alongside reporting reforms, the SRA is reinforcing the importance of robust internal governance. The proposals seek to enhance accountability of Compliance Officers for Finance and Administration (COFAs) by introducing safeguards where significant decision-making power is concentrated on a single individual and strengthening checks and balances within firms more broadly.

The SRA intends to introduce:

New criteria restricting owners or managers from holding one/ both key compliance roles exceeding certain thresholds (for example where annual turnover exceeds £600k and/ or the client money balance exceeds £2m at any point in the previous accounting period).

Partial exemption for sole owner-manager firms which meet the client money threshold, who will be prevented from holding the COFA role, only. There will be exemptions for firms exceeding the client money threshold due to abnormal non-representative transactions.

Support packages for compliance officers are being developed.

These measures reflect the SRA’s continued focus on culture, oversight and early risk identification, particularly in light of recent high-profile firm failures.

What this means for firms

Taken together, the SRA’s response signals a clear direction: increased oversight, enhanced reporting, and stronger accountability, without fundamentally altering the current client account model in the short term.

A phased transition is expected, with the changes being implemented in early 2027. Firms should begin preparing by:

  • Reviewing their accountants’ report processes and timetables
  • Ensuring systems can support timely and accurate reporting
  • Assessing governance structures, particularly COFA responsibilities

The SRA are continuing to examine, and will consult on, risk profile changes of firms, and potential notification requirements in respect of structural changes such as mergers and acquisitions. They also continue to consider the model for holding client money.

Our perspective

As a firm specialising in professional practices and SRA reporting, we have been engaging directly with the SRA and working with clients to anticipate and prepare for potential changes.

While many of the final proposals confirmed at this stage align with expectations, the increased regulatory scrutiny, particularly around accountants’ reports, represents a meaningful shift in compliance requirements. Early preparation will be key to ensuring a smooth transition.

We will continue to monitor developments and provide further insight as the SRA moves toward implementation.

If you would like to discuss how these developments may affect your firm, or review your current accountants’ report and governance arrangements, our specialist professional services team would be pleased to help. Get in touch with us today.

For more than accounting, business and wealth advice.
+44 (0)330 124 1399
enquiries@krestonreeves.com
www.krestonreeves.com
About the author

Merete joined Kreston Reeves in 2016 in the Accounts and Outsourcing team and went on to qualify as a chartered accountant with the firm. Merete manages a portfolio of clients, assisting with their accounts, business tax and personal tax compliance, as well as advising on business and personal tax planning.

She specialises in Professional Service firms, including solicitors, property management agents, and a range of professional consultants.

Merete has gained a wide range of experience in working with her solicitor clients to help plan and complete client money examinations, advise clients on their policies and procedures, and their compliance with the SRA Accounts Rules.

Interested in a confidential chat?

If you are considering outsourcing your legal cashiering, or just want to find out how it works, our team is here to help.

Contact us
Back to Blogs
Cashroom provides expert outsourced account services for law firms including legal cashiering, management accounts and payroll services. Our mission is to fee lawyers from the complexities of legal accounting by supporting the industry with accurate management information and allowing lawyers to do what they do best – practice law.

“I’ve been a client of Cashroom for over 10 years and couldn’t fault the service. When I started the firm, I had basic knowledge of compliance and bookkeeping but didn’t feel confident managing it myself. Cashroom took that weight off my shoulders and provided an invaluable resource I wouldn’t have been able to afford in-house.”

Mubasher Choudry
Mubasher Choudry
Mubasher Choudry Family Law Solutions

Preparing for Success

The weeks before a major tournament is always fascinating. Teams are rehearsing every play, refining every movement, sharpening every instinct. The margin for error at this level is tiny. Every decision matters. Talent alone won’t win. It’s preparation that separates the good from the great. 

The same is true in the life of a law firm leader. Every day brings deadlines, client expectations, and different challenges. The stakes are high, and the pressure is constant. Success, much like on the pitch, is rarely accidental but is hard earned over time. 

So, how can law firm leaders ensure their teams are prepared to perform their best? 

  1. Master the fundamentals

Even elite footballers spend hours on basic drills such as passing, ball control, and positioning. In law, the fundamentals are equally critical. Drafting clearly, checking facts rigorously, and ensuring communication is clear and precise are the building blocks of every client matter.  

A firm that establishes rigorous pre-completion checklists for property transactions, for instance, can prevent last-minute errors that would otherwise derail deals. Clear escalation protocols, regular reviews of high-risk clauses in contracts, and consistent client communication templates ensure that teams operate efficiently and reliably. Leaders who invest in structured, repeatable processes give their lawyers the confidence to handle complex matters and deliver consistently excellent results protecting both clients and the firm’s reputation. 

  1. Anticipate challenges 

Teams don’t enter a tournament blind to their opponents’ strengths or weaknesses. Lawyers, too, must anticipate risks before they materialise. This could mean proactively identifying bottlenecks in transactions, predicting contentious points in negotiations or foreseeing resource constraints during busy periods. 

For example, before a multi-party merger, a firm that maps out each stage, identifies dependencies between teams, and anticipates client and regulatory touchpoints can mitigate delays and prevent conflicts. Leaders who encourage scenario planning and risk awareness across the firm empower their teams to act decisively when challenges arise, turning potential crises into controlled outcomes.  

  1. Work as a team

No football team wins without coordination. On the pitch, players communicate constantly, cover for each other, and execute plays together with managers and coaches supporting from the sidelines. Lawyers operate the same way. Firms should encourage collaboration across colleagues, trainees, paralegals, clients and other available resources such as business coaches and outsourced service providers.  

During a complex transaction, clear communication between the legal team, finance, and client ensures deadlines are met and nothing falls through the cracks. Utilising trusted external support, like Cashroom, can add another layer of reliability and expertise, ensuring the financial transactions in each matter are compliant and efficiently processed. Building a network of reliable internal and external expertise amplifies the firm’s capacity to manage complexity, while respecting each team member’s role strengthens resilience and overall performance.  

  1. Take care of yourself

Athletes understand that performance depends on physical and mental fitness. Leaders in law often overlook the same principle. Long hours and high stress can cloud judgment, lead to burnout and increase mistakes.  

Law firm leaders who model energy management, enforce realistic workloads, and create a culture where taking breaks is accepted enable their teams to maintain focus and clarity. For example, implementing structured handover processes during peak periods, or rotating high-pressure assignments, ensures that lawyers can consistently perform at a high level without compromising wellbeing. Sustained success isn’t just about working harder; it’s about working smarter and sustaining your capacity to perform. 

 

  1. Learn from every experience

Even the best teams review each match, celebrate wins, and analyse mistakes. Law firms should do the same at both individual and organisational levels. Post-mortems, lessons learned reviews, and structured feedback loops transform experience into lasting improvement. 

After completing a particularly challenging property chain or complex commercial deal, reviewing what caused delays, where communications broke down, and what processes were most effective allows the firm to refine workflows for future matters. Leaders who prioritise reflection and not blame create a culture of continuous improvement, enabling the firm to adapt, grow, and consistently deliver better results. 

As the World Cup approaches, there is a simple truth for lawyers: preparation drives performance. Master the fundamentals, anticipate challenges, build and rely on a strong team, care for yourself and your people, and reflect on every experience.  

When the whistle blows, will your firm be ready to perform at its very best? 

Interested in a confidential chat?

If you are considering outsourcing your legal cashiering, or just want to find out how it works, our team is here to help.

Contact us
Back to Blogs
Cashroom provides expert outsourced account services for law firms including legal cashiering, management accounts and payroll services. Our mission is to fee lawyers from the complexities of legal accounting by supporting the industry with accurate management information and allowing lawyers to do what they do best – practice law.

“We have used Cashroom for many years, it’s a great system. Our firm is regularly instructed to support significant transactions – both in terms of the importance of deals, as well as their value. As a result, we need to be absolutely sure that we can rely and trust on our finance management partners to be able to administer fast, secure, and seamless transactions. We’ve never thought to look elsewhere as Cashroom have always been there for us.”

Sharon Needle
Sharon Needle
Needle Partners Limited

How Efficiency Reviews Can Transform Your Law Firm’s Finance Team

A law firm’s Finance team is central to its operations, managing everything from client monies and payments to billing and banking. Even the most experienced teams can face challenges that reduce efficiency, create risk, or impact staff morale. Conducting an efficiency review provides a structured way to understand these challenges and identify opportunities for improvement. 

 

What Does an Efficiency Review Involve? 

The purpose of an efficiency review is to assess the operational efficiency of a law firm’s Finance team. The scope typically covers: 

  • Reviewing the team structure and how responsibilities are allocated 
  • Examining core processes, including payments, monies in, banking, billing, and other cashiering functions 
  • Analysing daily workflows to identify bottlenecks or inefficiencies 
  • Conducting interviews with key staff, such as Finance Managers, Senior Legal Cashiers, Legal Cashiers, and Finance Assistants, to gather feedback on pain points and improvement suggestions 
  • Assessing compliance procedures, including SRA rules, authorisation policies, and interest policies 
  • Preparing recommendations for smoother operations and, where applicable, system migrations or technology integration 

 

The review combines observations of daily procedures with direct feedback from the team to provide a holistic view of the Finance operation. By doing so, it highlights areas where improvements can boost efficiency, reduce risk, and improve team satisfaction. 

 

The Benefits of Conducting an Efficiency Review 

 Enhanced Productivity 

Understanding workflows in detail allows firms to remove unnecessary steps, streamline processes, and ensure that tasks are completed more efficiently. 

Risk Mitigation 

Identifying weaknesses or gaps in processes helps to reduce errors and maintain compliance with regulatory accounting standards. 

Improved Team Morale 

Staff engagement increases when workflows are clear, repetitive bottlenecks are removed, and responsibilities are well-defined. 

Support for System Changes 

Efficiency reviews often include recommendations to prepare for migrations to new finance systems, helping firms implement technology that genuinely supports productivity. 

Actionable Insights from Staff 

By interviewing the team, including Finance Managers and Legal Cashiers, reviews capture practical insights on daily pain points, workflow challenges, and suggestions for improvement. 

Optimised Resource Allocation 

Analysis of processes such as weekly rotas or workload distribution helps ensure that resources are used effectively and critical tasks are prioritised. 

 

How the Process Works 

 A thorough efficiency review will: 

  • Interview key members of the Finance team to understand workflows and pain points 
  • Observe daily processes, including billing, banking, payments, and client money handling 
  • Analyse the current workflow and associated challenges 
  • Identify areas for improvement and provide practical recommendations 
  • Include guidance for system migration or technology upgrades to support better operations 

 

The goal is not simply to identify problems, but to create a clear roadmap for improvement that balances productivity, risk management, and team satisfaction. After an efficiency review has taken place, a law firm should expect to receive a detailed report documenting processes, observations and pain points, along with clear, actionable recommendations and guidance on compliance improvements and risk mitigation.  

 

Why Law Firms Should Consider an Efficiency Review 

 Efficiency reviews provide law firms with evidence-based insights into how their Finance teams operate, revealing blocks, compliance risks, and opportunities for improvement. They enable firms to make informed decisions about team structure, process design, and system adoption, ultimately leading to smoother operations, happier staff, and better service for clients. 

 

Specialist providers, such as Cashroom, offer structured efficiency reviews tailored for law firms. These reviews provide actionable recommendations and support teams in enhancing productivity, mitigating risk, and preparing for successful system changes. 

Interested in a confidential chat?

If you are considering outsourcing your legal cashiering, or just want to find out how it works, our team is here to help.

Contact us
Back to Blogs
Cashroom provides expert outsourced account services for law firms including legal cashiering, management accounts and payroll services. Our mission is to fee lawyers from the complexities of legal accounting by supporting the industry with accurate management information and allowing lawyers to do what they do best – practice law.

“We have used Cashroom for many years, it’s a great system. Our firm is regularly instructed to support significant transactions – both in terms of the importance of deals, as well as their value. As a result, we need to be absolutely sure that we can rely and trust on our finance management partners to be able to administer fast, secure, and seamless transactions. We’ve never thought to look elsewhere as Cashroom have always been there for us.”

Sharon Needle
Sharon Needle
Needle Partners Limited

Data Protection Complaints: What Firms Need to Know Before June 2026

By Eva Ozlem Berktas, Analyst at Teal Compliance. Teal’s compliance consultants provide risk management support to law firms, helping them build compliance that works

There’s a significant change on the horizon for organisations handling personal data in the UK. From 19 June 2026, all organisations will be legally required to have a clear process in place for handling data protection complaints. This requirement comes under the new Data (Use and Access) Act and marks a shift towards greater transparency and accountability.

So, what does this actually mean in practice?

A New Legal Duty – Made Simple

At its core, the law is about making sure people have a straightforward way to raise concerns about how their personal data is being handled and that those concerns are taken seriously.

Organisations will need to:

  • Provide a clear way for individuals to raise a data protection complaint
  • Acknowledge complaints within 30 days
  • Take reasonable steps to investigate and respond without unnecessary delay
  • Keep the individual updated as the matter progresses
  • Provide a clear outcome once the complaint has been addressed

While this might sound like an extension of existing good practice, it’s now becoming a formal legal obligation.

What Counts as a Data Protection Complaint?

A data protection complaint is essentially any concern about how an organisation handles someone’s personal information.

This could include situations where someone is unhappy about:

  • A data breach that has affected them
  • How their data rights request (such as access or deletion) has been handled
  • How long their personal data is being retained
  • Whether their information is accurate
  • The security measures used to protect their data
  • Profiling or automated decision-making
  • Or any other issue relating to the use of their personal information

Previously, many organisations will be familiar with the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) contacting them after receiving a complaint. Going forward, the ICO is more likely to direct individuals back to the organisation first.

In other words, if your process isn’t visible or easy to use, it will quickly become obvious.

What Isn’t a Data Protection Complaint?

Not every issue involving personal data falls into this category.

For example, it’s quite common for someone to raise a general complaint while also exercising their data rights but that doesn’t automatically make it a data protection complaint.

Some typical examples include:

  • Someone unhappy with how quickly their request was handled, even if it was within legal timeframes
  • An employee raising a workplace grievance alongside a request for their personal data
  • A customer service complaint where the individual also asks for their data to be deleted

In these situations, the data rights request should be handled separately from the broader complaint.

If there’s ever uncertainty, the simplest solution is to ask the individual to clarify what they’re raising.

Making It Easy for People to Complain

One of the key expectations is accessibility. People need a clear and simple way to raise concerns.

There’s no single prescribed method, but organisations might consider offering:

  • An online or downloadable complaints form
  • A dedicated email address or phone line
  • A customer portal
  • Live chat with escalation to a person
  • In-person options where appropriate

That said, people don’t have to follow your preferred process. A complaint could come through any channel email, social media, or even via a member of staff who wasn’t expecting it.

That’s why internal awareness is just as important as the process itself.

Don’t Forget Your People

Policies alone won’t make this work. Employees need to understand:

  • What a data protection complaint looks like
  • How to recognise one when it comes in
  • What steps to take next

Without this awareness, complaints risk being missed or mishandled.

Be Transparent from the Start

Another important change is around communication.

When you collect someone’s personal data, you’ll need to make it clear that they have the right to raise a complaint. This means updating privacy notices and ensuring responses to data rights requests include information about your complaints process.

Although not strictly required, it’s also good practice to publish your complaints procedure on your website. This can help manage expectations and reduce confusion.

You might include:

  • What information is needed to investigate a complaint
  • Any identification requirements
  • What happens if someone is acting on behalf of another person
  • Expected timelines for acknowledgement, updates, and outcomes

Do You Need a Separate Policy?

Interestingly, the law doesn’t require a standalone data protection complaints policy. You could incorporate it into your existing complaints framework.

However, in practice, separating the two can make things clearer for both your team and your clients.

Why? Because the timelines and expectations are different.

For example:

  • The Legal Ombudsman typically expects a full response within 8 weeks
  • Many firms acknowledge general complaints within a few days
  • Data protection complaints, however, must be acknowledged within 30 days, with outcomes provided “without undue delay”

Having a distinct process can help avoid confusion and ensure the right standards are applied in the right situations.

Final Thoughts

This new requirement isn’t just about compliance, it’s about trust.

By putting clear, accessible processes in place and making sure your team understands them, you’re not only meeting your legal obligations but also demonstrating that you take people’s data rights seriously.

With June 2026 approaching, now is a good time to review your current approach and make any necessary changes.

About the Author

Eva Ozlem Berktas, Analyst at Teal Compliance, is an experienced compliance professional with a background in the legal and art sectors. She has also worked in the AML team for the Solicitors Regulation Authority, carrying out audits and investigations into law firms’ AML compliance.

Interested in a confidential chat?

If you are considering outsourcing your legal cashiering, or just want to find out how it works, our team is here to help.

Contact us
Back to Blogs
Cashroom provides expert outsourced account services for law firms including legal cashiering, management accounts and payroll services. Our mission is to fee lawyers from the complexities of legal accounting by supporting the industry with accurate management information and allowing lawyers to do what they do best – practice law.

“I’ve been a client of Cashroom for over 10 years and couldn’t fault the service. When I started the firm, I had basic knowledge of compliance and bookkeeping but didn’t feel confident managing it myself. Cashroom took that weight off my shoulders and provided an invaluable resource I wouldn’t have been able to afford in-house.”

Mubasher Choudry
Mubasher Choudry
Mubasher Choudry Family Law Solutions

In conversation with Alex Holt and Emma O’Day

As we continue into 2026, there is a noticeable shift in how law firms are thinking about resourcing, risk, and resilience. To explore, we sat down with Alex Holt and Emma O’Day to discuss why more firms are actively considering outsourcing, what’s driving the trend, and what it means for the future of legal finance and operations. 

Is outsourcing becoming more common in law firms? 

Cashroom: We’re hearing more conversations about outsourcing than ever before. Is that something you’re both seeing day to day? 

Alex Holt: Absolutely. There was a time when outsourcing was viewed more as a last resort, something firms considered only when they were under real pressure. What I am seeing now on a daily basis is very different. Firms are proactively exploring it as a strategic decision, not a reactive one. They’re no longer asking, ‘What’s gone wrong?’ before they consider outsourcing. Instead, they’re asking, ‘How can we build something more resilient and sustainable?’ 

Emma O’Day: I agree. There’s been a real shift in mindset over the last year or so. Rather than focusing purely on cost, firms are weighing up outsourcing as a way to strengthen operations. And it’s not just finance. Firms outsource many other areas too, like marketing, IT, and HR. Law firms have such a great selection of outsourced providers to now choose from – so they can really find the best fit for their firms. 


What’s driving law firms to consider outsourcing their Cashroom 

Cashroom: What’s driving this change? Why now? 

Emma O’Day: There are a few factors coming together. Recruitment and retention are big reasons. Experienced legal cashiers and finance professionals are in high demand, and firms are finding it harder to build and maintain in-house teams with the right level of expertise. 

Alex Holt: And even when firms do recruit, there’s a real risk in having knowledge concentrated in one or two people. If someone leaves, goes on long-term leave, or reduces their hours, the impact can be significant. 

On top of that, regulatory pressure hasn’t eased. I’m speaking with different firms everyday who are all saying the same thing: compliance is more complex, expectations are getting higher, and there’s much less margin for error now. Firms are looking at outsourced providers like us to bring our expertise to regulation and ensure compliance. 


From cost-saving to risk management 

Cashroom: Historically, outsourcing has been associated with cost-cutting. Is that still the case? 

Alex Holt: No, not anymore. It’s about accessing a level of expertise, consistency, and capability that is very difficult to build and sustain in-house. With Cashroom, firms gain a fully trained, highly experienced team – many with decades in legal finance – without the challenges of recruitment, training, or staff turnover.  

All new team members complete our Cashroom Academy training programme, and we work closely with the ILFM to ensure our people are fully up to date with the latest regulatory requirements. This means we have a deep understanding of what regulators expect and how to keep your firm compliant. 

Emma O’Day: Exactly, while cost efficiency can be a benefit, outsourcing with Cashroom is no longer simply about cutting costs. What really sets Cashroom apart is the combination of people and technology 

In addition to our people, we provide access to financial technology through our Cashroom portal- capabilities that are not typically available to in-house teams or other outsourcing providers. It’s the combination of highly experienced people and purpose-built technology that makes Cashroom truly stand out. 

Alex Holt: Our team are great at sharing their knowledge too. We work across multiple different systems and everyone’s fantastic at passing down their experience and know-how. Read More


The Strategic Benefits of Working with Law Firm Accounting Providers

Running a law firm requires precision in both legal work and financial management. Behind every successful practice is a solid financial foundation. Yet many solicitors struggle with complex accounting requirements while focusing on client cases. 

 

Legal accounting carries unique challenges. Mistakes can lead to regulatory interventions from the SRA or Law Society of Scotland, HMRC penalties, or serious reputational damage. This is why working with specialist law firm accounting companies is so important. 

 

The Importance of Accurate Financial Records 

Accurate financial records act as a firm’s compass, guiding decisions and ensuring compliance with regulations. Proper documentation protects the practice and gives clarity over profitability. 

Specialist accountants for law firms provide systems that include: 

  • Clear separation of firm and client money 
  • Comprehensive client account management 
  • Detailed client billing records 
  • Accurate tracking of expenses 
  • Documentation that stands up to scrutiny 

 

Benefits of accurate records include: 

  • Compliance protection: Clear records demonstrate transparency during SRA reviews or HMRC enquiries 
  • Business insights: Understand which practice areas are profitable and where improvements are needed 
  • Strategic planning: Historical data helps with budgeting and forecasting 
  • Simplified tax management: Organised records make year-end submissions easier 
  • Peace of mind: Focus on practising law rather than chasing numbers 

 

Understanding Tax Obligations 

UK law firms face complex tax rules including: 

  • Income reporting for disbursements and billable time 
  • VAT on legal services 
  • Payroll and pension obligations 
  • HMRC compliance with client account transactions 

Staying current with regulations requires dedicated focus, which busy solicitors rarely have. Specialist legal accountants ensure full compliance while identifying opportunities for tax efficiency. 

 

Expert Guidance and Strategic Advice 

Specialist accountants for law firms provide proactive support to prevent costly mistakes. This includes: 

  • Regular compliance reviews 
  • Ongoing tax and VAT planning 
  • Up-to-date knowledge of SRA Accounts Rules 
  • Industry-specific best practices 
  • Advice to optimise profitability and cash flow 

For example, they help firms structure partner drawings, manage client disbursements correctly, and implement robust internal controls. This reduces the risk of regulatory breaches. 

 

Managing Client and Office Money 

Handling client funds is high-risk. Mishandling can lead to SRA investigation, fines, or intervention. Best practices include: 

  • Separate accounts: Client funds kept entirely separate from firm money 
  • Detailed records: Track individual client balances 
  • Regular reconciliation: Conduct three-way reconciliations monthly 
  • Clear documentation: Maintain full audit trails 
  • Transparent client reporting: Provide detailed statements 

Specialist accounting companies implement systems that automate many of these processes. This reduces both risk and administrative burden. 

 

Budget Management and Financial Reporting 

Accurate reporting supports both compliance and strategic growth. Essential practices include: 

  • Realistic budgets: Evidence-based projections from historical data 
  • Variance analysis: Compare actual versus expected performance monthly 
  • Cash flow forecasting: Identify potential shortfalls before they arise 
  • Profitability analysis: Track performance by practice area and client 
  • Expense controls: Ensure spending aligns with budget 

Professional accountants tailor reporting to provide actionable insights, helping firms make informed decisions. 

 

Technology and Automation

Technology is essential in modern law firm accounting. Key advantages include: 

  • Automated reconciliation: Flag potential client account issues before they become problems 
  • Electronic payment processing: Creates clear documentation trails 
  • Integrated systems: Combine practice management with accounting software 
  • Secure digital storage: Protect financial records 
  • Automated compliance checks: Ensure adherence to SRA rules 

Platforms such as  Clio, Actionstep or Smokeball improve efficiency when implemented correctly. Specialist accountants leverage technology to enhance compliance, reduce errors, and save time. 

 

Outsourced Accounting Solutions 

Cashroom provides outsourced legal accounting services exclusively for law firms. We combine specialist knowledge with technology to deliver financial solutions tailored to your firm’s needs. 

Benefits of outsourcing include: 

  • Cost efficiency: Typically 30-50 percent less than maintaining an in-house accounting team with comparable expertise 
  • Access to specialist knowledge: Professionals understand legal accounting requirements, trust account management, and regulatory rules 
  • Scalability: Services adjust as your firm grows 
  • Reduced risk: Professional oversight minimises errors, compliance issues, and fraud 
  • Improved focus: Your team can concentrate on practising law while experts manage finances 
  • Technology access: Benefit from advanced accounting tools without large investments 

Firms that outsource accounting report higher profitability, more efficient processes, and reduced compliance risk. 

 

Recommendations for Law Firms 

  • Assess your current accounting systems and ensure they meet legal-specific requirements 
  • Consider working with specialised accountants rather than general providers 
  • Embrace integrated, cloud-based systems for efficiency and compliance 
  • Implement strong internal controls, particularly for client funds 
  • Seek professional guidance for compliance and strategic advantage 

Proper accounting safeguards your practice and allows you to focus on clients. 

 

Contact Cashroom today to discover how our specialist legal accounting and cashiering services can protect your firm, improve efficiency, and provide peace of mind. 

Interested in a confidential chat?

If you are considering outsourcing your legal cashiering, or just want to find out how it works, our team is here to help.

Contact us
Back to Blogs
Cashroom provides expert outsourced account services for law firms including legal cashiering, management accounts and payroll services. Our mission is to fee lawyers from the complexities of legal accounting by supporting the industry with accurate management information and allowing lawyers to do what they do best – practice law.

“We have used Cashroom for many years, it’s a great system. Our firm is regularly instructed to support significant transactions – both in terms of the importance of deals, as well as their value. As a result, we need to be absolutely sure that we can rely and trust on our finance management partners to be able to administer fast, secure, and seamless transactions. We’ve never thought to look elsewhere as Cashroom have always been there for us.”

Sharon Needle
Sharon Needle
Needle Partners Limited

The Human Side of Legal Finance

Behind the numbers and compliance checklists, there are the people who are carrying the responsibility. In many law firms, that responsibility sits with partners and finance teams who know that one missed detail or error made can have regulatory consequences.  

For many firms, this background anxiety can affect wellbeing, team performance and ultimately the quality of service delivered to clients. Add to that the ongoing shortage of skilled legal cashiers and the pressure on finance teams has never been greater.  

As Chris O’Day, CEO of The Cashroom explains, as well as efficiency and compliance, outsourcing legal finance provides firms the headspace, resilience, and operational support needed to focus on growth, clients, and strategy, without carrying the stress of daily finance operations alone. 

 

Q. Many firms tell us their teams feel a real sense of relief when financial operations are outsourced. In your experience, what kind of wellbeing improvements do firms actually notice once this pressure is lifted?

A. The most common word we hear from partners after go-live is “headspace”.

Before outsourcing, a lot of senior people are carrying a quiet anxiety about whether the books are right, whether the reconciliations are up to date, and whether they’d be comfortable if a regulator knocked on the door tomorrow. That background noise takes a toll. When Cashroom comes in, that day-to-day worry about process and control is taken on by a team whose sole focus is legal finance. 

It’s important to be clear, though: firms still own the risk. What we do is take on the heavy lifting of the day-to-day finance processes and controls, so that pressure isn’t sitting on the partners’ shoulders alone. That shift in where the operational burden sits makes a real difference to wellbeing. 

For finance staff, it can actually be an improvement too. In many firms, a single cashier is expected to be an expert in client accounts, VAT, payroll, credit control and reporting, often with limited support or cover. Holidays and sick leave become sources of stress. In our model, those responsibilities are shared across a team of specialists, with built-in resilience and knowledge-sharing. It’s a much healthier setup. 

Lawyers notice the change in small, practical ways: payment requests are responded to promptly and consistently; they’re not chasing for statements or reports; and month-end isn’t a mad scramble. The relationship with “accounts” becomes more collaborative and less adversarial. 

And for managing partners, there’s a psychological benefit in knowing there is a specialist organisation – with over 140 people and more than 15 years in the sector – standing behind their finance function. It gives them the confidence to focus on growth, people and clients, rather than constantly firefighting back-office issues. 

 

 Q. The shortage of experienced legal cashiers is hitting many firms hard. What challenges is this creating on the ground, and how does outsourcing help firms overcome or avoid these issues?

A. The shortage shows up in three main ways. 

First, recruitment. Firms advertise for months without finding someone with the right blend of legal accounts knowledge, regulatory understanding and practical experience. Legal cashiering is a specialism; it’s not something a general bookkeeper can just “pick up” in a few weeks. 

Second, retention. When you do find a good cashier, they’re in high demand. If they leave, you’re back to square one; except now you also have a knowledge gap and a potential risk around handover. 

Third, resilience. Many firms are operating with a “team” of one. Holidays, sickness and peaks in workload become real stress points. If something goes wrong or is missed during one of those periods, it can have regulatory consequences. 

Outsourcing effectively de-risks all three. We carry the burden of recruiting, training and retaining legal finance specialists. Our clients benefit from a team rather than an individual – with built-in cover, structured supervision and ongoing professional development. 

Because we see patterns across a large client base, we’re also able to spot issues early and share best practice. If a new type of fraud attempt emerges, or there’s a change in how regulators are interpreting a particular rule, we can update our processes and guidance quickly and consistently. That’s much harder to do when you’re relying on a small in-house team to keep on top of everything alongside their day job. 

Ultimately, outsourcing lets firms stop worrying about whether they’ll be able to fill the next cashier vacancy and focus instead on how finance can support their strategy. 

 

Q. Outsourcing still carries a few misconceptions, cost-cutting often being the biggest one. What misunderstandings do you encounter most frequently, and how do you go about reframing them?

A. The cost-cutting misconception is definitely the most common: the idea that outsourcing is just about doing things cheaper. In reality, most of the firms we work with are motivated first by risk and resilience, then by efficiency, and only finally by cost cutting. They want to sleep better at night knowing their client money is handled properly and their finance function can cope with growth or shocks. 

Another misconception is loss of control – the fear that “if we give this to someone else, we won’t know what’s going on”. The reality is usually the opposite. Because we standardise processes and use technology to track requests, approvals and reconciliations, firms often end up with more transparency than they had before. Partners can see workflows and management information around their finances in a way that was never possible with an informal, email-driven in-house process. 

There’s also occasionally a concern that outsourcing will feel impersonal. We’re very deliberate about the opposite: clients have named contacts, regular calls and a sense that our team is an extension of theirs. When firms talk about us, they usually talk about their relationship with specific people, not just “a service”. 

When we talk to firms, we tend to reframe outsourcing as an investment in capability, not a simple cost play. It’s about buying expertise, systems and resilience that would be very difficult and expensive to build alone. 


Outsourcing legal finance isn’t a magic wand, and it doesn’t remove the firm’s ultimate responsibility. What it does do is shift the operational burden to a specialist team trained to manage risk, maintain compliance, and deliver continuity. 

For partners, that means less anxiety and more room to focus on clients and strategy. For finance teams, it means shared responsibility, proper cover, and a healthier, more collaborative environment. And for the firm as a whole, it creates resilience against staff shortages, turnover, and operational disruption. 

More than just protecting client money, outsourcing to providers like Cashroom shields the firm’s people too, giving them the focus and confidence to perform at their best. 


About Chris O’Day

Chris O’Day is a Chartered Accountant, having qualified at Deloitte and has had a significant impact at Cashroom over the years since joining in 2014. After joining Cashroom as a Management Accountant, his extensive experience in legal accounting saw him become Cashroom’s Client Services Director in 2017 – gaining significant insight as to what is valuable to clients and to the legal industry, before taking on the CEO role in 2021 to drive the next phase of Cashroom’s growth. 

Chris finds endless opportunities and has a key focus on challenging the status quo in order to drive continuous improvement across the business and the services Cashroom provide to the Legal Sector. Chris believes that being client-centric is key to any service business – understanding what lawyers want and need and ensuring Cashroom deliver the best customer experience that is efficient, compliant and risk-free.

Interested in a confidential chat?

Learn how Cashroom can help your firm build a finance function that’s both secure and scalable.

Contact us
Back to Blogs
Cashroom provides expert outsourced account services for law firms including legal cashiering, management accounts and payroll services. Our mission is to fee lawyers from the complexities of legal accounting by supporting the industry with accurate management information and allowing lawyers to do what they do best – practice law.

“I’ve been a client of Cashroom for over 10 years and couldn’t fault the service. When I started the firm, I had basic knowledge of compliance and bookkeeping but didn’t feel confident managing it myself. Cashroom took that weight off my shoulders and provided an invaluable resource I wouldn’t have been able to afford in-house.”

Mubasher Choudry
Mubasher Choudry
Mubasher Choudry Family Law Solutions

Law Firm Accounting Strategies: How to Unlock Profit and Sustainable Growth

Managing client accounts, partner rewards, and translating billable hours into actual profit can be complex for law firms. However, with the right systems and strategies, it’s possible to master these complexities and set your firm up for financial success. 

 

In this post, we’ll explain why law firm accounting is unique, discuss the metrics that matter most for your bottom line, and provide actionable tips to help you identify and address profitability leaks. By the end, you’ll know how to build an accounting system that supports growth and maximises take-home revenue. 

 

Why Law Firm Accounting Is Different from Traditional Business Accounting 

 Law firm accounting differs from other businesses largely because of the regulation surrounding the handling of clients’ money. Every solicitor must keep client funds separate from firm funds, comply with the SRA Accounts Rules, and maintain accurate records. Mistakes can lead to disciplinary action, fines, and reputational damage. 

Understanding Client Accounts and SRA Compliance 

Client money must be held in a designated client account. This ensures it’s kept separate from the firm’s operating accounts until the work is completed and billed. 

 

Example: If your firm receives a £10,000 retainer, this money isn’t yours yet. Only once the work is completed and invoiced can you transfer the earned portion to your firm account. 

 

Compliance with SRA rules is non-negotiable, and accurate record-keeping is essential to avoid penalties. 

 

How Partner and Staff Compensation Impacts Accounting 

 UK law firms often have varied pay structures: 

  • Partners taking a monthly draw against firm profits 
  • Associates on a salary plus bonuses 
  • Consultants or of counsel paid hourly or on a case-by-case basis 
  • Originating partners receiving revenue-based incentives 

 

Each model requires careful accounting. Contingency or success-fee work adds complexity, as revenue may not be realised for months or even years. 

The Metrics That Really Drive Profitability 

Why Billable Hours Does Not Equal Profit 

Just because a solicitor bills 40 hours per week at £200/hour doesn’t mean the firm earns £8,000. You must account for: 

  • Discounts and write-offs 
  • Uncollected or late payments 
  • Non-billable admin or support work 

Tracking realisation rate – the proportion of billed fees collected is key. 

 

Key Profitability KPIs 

 Track these metrics to monitor your firm’s financial health: 

  • Realisation rate: Fees collected ÷ fees billed 
  • Collection rate: Payments ÷ accounts receivable  
  • Lock-up: WIP + A/R 
  • Effective hourly rate: Revenue collected ÷ total hours worked 

 

Connecting Fee Earner Performance to Profit 

Understanding which fee earners, clients, or matter types generate profit is critical. Subtract salaries, overhead allocations, and related expenses from collected revenue to see net contribution. Accurate accounting allows partners to make data-driven decisions and spot inefficiencies. 

 

Core Components of Law Firm Accounting 

Accurate Client Account Reconciliation 

Reconciling client accounts regularly is essential. Accounting software such as Clio or Actionstep can automate this, but oversight by an experienced accountant ensures compliance. 

Revenue Recognition 

Funds in a client account are liabilities, not income. Revenue can only be recognised as work is completed and billed. Proper recognition keeps books accurate and ensures tax compliance.  

Expense Allocation 

Assigning expenses to clients, cases, or teams helps track true profitability and informs business decisions. 

Partner Compensation 

A clear structure with accurate records keeps multi-partner firms aligned and prevents disputes over profit sharing. 

 

Technology and Automation in Modern Law Firm Accounting 

Automation helps UK law firms save time and reduce risk: 

  • Integrate practice management software (e.g., LEAP, Clio, Actionstep) with accounting platforms. 
  • Automate reconciliations and invoicing to reduce human error. 
  • Use dashboards to track key metrics such as realisation, collection rates, and profit by matter or solicitor. 

 

Common Profitability Leaks and How to Fix Them 

Unbilled Work and Delayed Invoicing 

Track time carefully and invoice promptly. Delays can significantly impact cashflow. 

 

High Write-offs and Discounts 

Monitor and control discounts. Track write-offs by client or fee earner to maintain profitability. 

 

Overdue Accounts 

Aged accounts receivable beyond 60 days drastically reduce likelihood of collection. Follow up proactively. 

 

Client Account Mismanagement 

Maintaining client accounts is non-negotiable. Regular reconciliations and strict adherence to SRA rules protect your firm and your clients. 

 

Building a Scalable Accounting System 

When to Upgrade 

Consider professional accounting solutions when: 

  • Your firm has more than five employees 
  • You’re expanding practice areas or offices 
  • Accounting takes 10+ hours per month 
  • Before client account issues arise 

Internal Controls 

Set up checks and balances, such as partner sign-off for large payments and segregation of billing and collection duties. 

 

Planning for Growth 

Accurate accounting supports expansion: cash flow forecasting, partner compensation modelling, and budgeting for staff and IT investments. 

 

How a Professional Law Firm Accountant Improves Profitability 

Daily Money Management 

A specialised accountant can handle: 

  • Client and operating account reconciliations 
  • Accounts payable and receivable 
  • Payroll and tax filings 
  • Invoicing and collections 

 

Strategic Advisory

They can also: 

  • Optimise fee structures 
  • Assess contingency portfolios 
  • Restructure partner draws 
  • Benchmark against similar-sized UK firms 

 

Next Steps for Law Firms 

Mastering accounting is one of the highest-ROI initiatives for law firms. With the right people, processes, and technology, you can eliminate profit leaks, manage cashflow, and gain clear visibility into performance. 

 

Cashroom helps law firms understand their numbers, maintain client account compliance, and build a foundation for growth. 

 

Download our free guide: 10 Simple Ways to Manage Your Law Firm’s Cash Flow to get started. 

Interested in a confidential chat?

If you are considering outsourcing your legal cashiering, or just want to find out how it works, our team is here to help.

Contact us
Back to Blogs
Cashroom provides expert outsourced account services for law firms including legal cashiering, management accounts and payroll services. Our mission is to fee lawyers from the complexities of legal accounting by supporting the industry with accurate management information and allowing lawyers to do what they do best – practice law.

“We have used Cashroom for many years, it’s a great system. Our firm is regularly instructed to support significant transactions – both in terms of the importance of deals, as well as their value. As a result, we need to be absolutely sure that we can rely and trust on our finance management partners to be able to administer fast, secure, and seamless transactions. We’ve never thought to look elsewhere as Cashroom have always been there for us.”

 

Sharon Needle
Sharon Needle
Needle Partners Limited

Managing Your Team, Including Difficult People

If you missed Law Firm Ambition’s recent webinar, “Managing Your Team, Including Difficult People”, this blog is inspired and follows the key insights and discussions shared during the session.  

In any organisation, teams power everything. Strategy may define direction, but culture determines whether that strategy succeeds. In law firms particularly, where success depends on collaboration, trust and high performance, poor management can quickly undermine even the best business plans. 

Yet managing people is often the most challenging aspect of running a legal practice. It requires a balance of leadership, communication, accountability and empathy. When that balance is missing, the result can be unhappy teams, declining productivity and ultimately higher staff turnover. 

 

The Cost of Unhappy and Unproductive Teams

Unhappy teams rarely appear overnight. Instead, issues tend to develop gradually through a combination of unclear expectations, poor communication, lack of accountability or unresolved conflict. 

 

When these issues are not addressed early, the consequences can be significant. High-performing individuals may become disengaged if they feel standards are inconsistent or problems are ignored. Team dynamics can deteriorate, and productivity often falls. 

 

Staff turnover is another major risk. Replacing employees in the legal sector is expensive and time-consuming. Recruitment fees, training costs, onboarding time and the loss of institutional knowledge all contribute to the true cost of replacing someone. In addition, the impact on existing team members, who may need to absorb additional work while a replacement is found, can further affect morale. 

 

This is why effective leadership matters. There is a widely recognised truth in management that people rarely leave jobs, they leave their manager. When individuals feel unsupported, misunderstood or unfairly treated, they are far more likely to look elsewhere. 

 

The People Issues Managers Face Most Often

Managers across law firms consistently report that a significant portion of their time is spent dealing with people-related challenges. Polling during the recent Law Firm Ambition webinar, highlights several key areas that dominate leadership time: 

Performance management and wellbeing were the most common issues, and they are often closely connected. When someone is struggling with their workload or performance expectations, stress levels can increase. Equally, external pressures or personal circumstances can affect an individual’s ability to perform at work. 

 

Recognising the connection between these factors is important. Addressing performance issues without understanding the wider context can lead to misunderstandings, while focusing solely on wellbeing without addressing accountability can also create problems within a team. The key is to address issues early and constructively. 

 

Recognising the Early Warning Signs 

Performance problems rarely begin with major mistakes or obvious failures. In most cases, the earliest indicators are subtle behavioural changes. 

Managers should be alert to patterns such as: 

  • Increasing inconsistency in work quality 
  • Missed or delayed deadlines 
  • Reduced engagement in meetings or discussions 
  • Withdrawal from colleagues or team activities 
  • Minor disagreements or tension within the team 
  • A noticeable drop in motivation or enthusiasm 

 

Individually, these behaviours may not appear significant. However, when they occur repeatedly, they may signal a deeper issue. Early intervention is critical. The goal is not to “catch someone out” but to identify potential problems early enough to reset expectations and provide support where needed. Approaching these conversations in the right way can make a significant difference. 

 

Starting the Conversation Early 

One of the most common mistakes managers make is waiting too long before addressing issues. Leaders can often hope that problems will resolve themselves or worry that raising concerns may damage relationships. In reality, avoiding conversations usually allows issues to escalate. When concerns arise, managers should focus on understanding rather than accusing. Open questions can help uncover underlying causes: 

“I’ve noticed a few deadlines have slipped recently. Is there anything affecting your workload?” 

“You seem quieter in meetings than usual. Is everything okay?” 

“Are there any challenges with the current priorities we should discuss?” 

 

These conversations shouldn’t feel like an interrogation or an attempt to build a disciplinary case. Instead, they should focus on exploring what is happening and clarifying expectations. Managers should also avoid relying on rumours or informal commentary from others. Listening to whispers within the team can quickly create a “herd mentality” where assumptions replace facts. Trust is built through direct communication. 

 

Clarifying Expectations and Addressing Misalignment 

A surprisingly common cause of performance issues is simple misalignment. Employees may not always be clear about what is expected of them, particularly in fast-paced environments where priorities shift frequently. For example, a fee earner may believe they are focusing on the most valuable work, while their manager may expect them to prioritise different matters or clients. Without clear communication, both individuals can become frustrated. 

 

Managers should therefore ensure that expectations are explicit. During conversations, it can be helpful to summarise key points and play them back to the individual: 

 

  • What outcomes are expected 
  • What priorities should be focused on 
  • What support may be required 

 

Documenting these discussions is also important. A written record ensures clarity for both parties and provides a reference point for future conversations. 

 

Follow-up meetings should then be scheduled to review progress. Some individuals require more regular check-ins than others, particularly if they are adjusting to new responsibilities or systems. 

 

When Performance and Stress Intersect 

A common scenario in performance management arises when individuals raise concerns about stress once performance discussions begin. In many organisations, a significant proportion of formal performance processes involve employees reporting stress or providing medical notes. While wellbeing should always be taken seriously, it is important for employers to maintain appropriate oversight. Supporting employees does not mean relinquishing responsibility for managing performance. 

 

Employers can request medical reports from a GP or occupational health specialist to understand the diagnosis and any recommended workplace adjustments. This helps ensure that decisions are informed and fair. 

At the same time, managers should continue to engage constructively with the employee, maintaining a balance between care and accountability. Leadership involves ensuring that individuals are supported while also ensuring the organisation continues to operate effectively. 

 

Creating a Culture of Accountability 

Strong teams require both trust and accountability. Team leaders play a critical role in creating an environment where individuals understand their responsibilities and feel ownership over their work. This begins with clarity around targets and expectations. In law firms, for example, fee targets can often feel abstract or overwhelming. Breaking them down into smaller, tangible components can make them more manageable. 

 

For instance: 

  • How many matters are required to reach the target? 
  • What is the average value of each matter? 
  • How does monthly performance contribute to the annual goal? 

 

When individuals understand how their daily work contributes to broader business objectives, they are more likely to remain motivated and focused. Managers should also involve their teams in discussions about priorities and workload. When people understand why certain decisions are made, they are more likely to support them. 

 

Changing the Conditions for Better Performance 

Sometimes the root cause of performance issues lies not with individuals but with the systems or processes surrounding them. 

 

For example: 

  • Deadlines may not be clearly communicated. 
  • Workloads may exceed realistic capacity. 
  • New systems or software may not have been fully explained. 

 

In these situations, simply asking people to work harder will not solve the problem. Instead, leaders may need to adjust the working environment. This could involve slowing processes temporarily to reset expectations, improving communication around priorities, or providing additional training. 

 

Managers should also be careful not to become the default problem-solver for every issue. When leaders constantly step in to fix problems themselves, they can unintentionally discourage initiative within the team. Instead, asking team members what they believe the solution might be can help build confidence and encourage ownership. 

 

The Role of Regular One-to-One Meetings 

One of the simplest yet most powerful management tools is the regular one-to-one meeting. Unfortunately, these meetings are often the first to be cancelled when workloads increase. Managers may feel that because they spoke to someone the day before, a formal check-in is unnecessary. However, structured one-to-one meetings provide an opportunity for deeper discussion. They allow space to review progress, address challenges and provide feedback in a more thoughtful way. 

 

Feedback should never be reserved only for formal reviews or disciplinary processes. When given regularly and constructively, it helps individuals grow and strengthens trust within the team. 

 

Managing Across Different Levels of Seniority 

 

People challenges arise at every level of a firm, but the nature of those challenges can vary depending on seniority. Managing junior employees often involves building confidence, providing guidance and helping them develop professional skills. 

 

 

Managing more senior professionals, however, can present different complexities. A senior fee earner or partner may view themselves as an equal to the person managing them, which can create tension when feedback is required. In some cases, individuals who generate significant revenue may feel less inclined to engage with management processes. Conversations can therefore feel more personal or sensitive. 

 

However, senior individuals also have a powerful influence on culture. Their behaviour sets the tone for the rest of the organisation. If senior leaders demonstrate professionalism, accountability and openness to feedback, others are far more likely to follow their example. Tools such as 360-degree feedback can help senior professionals gain insight into how their behaviour affects colleagues and the wider business. 

 

Supporting and Developing Managers 

Another important consideration is the capability of managers themselves. In many law firms, individuals are promoted into management roles because of their technical expertise rather than their leadership ability. Being an excellent lawyer does not automatically mean someone will be an effective manager.  

 

Without training or support, new managers may struggle to navigate team dynamics, address performance issues or handle difficult conversations. Developing strong managers requires deliberate investment. This may include: 

 

  • Leadership training programmes 
  • Practical management toolkits 
  • Coaching or mentoring 
  • Peer learning groups or coaching circles 

 

Importantly, training should not be treated as a one-off exercise. Managers need opportunities to apply what they have learned, reflect on their experiences and continue developing their skills. 

 

The Challenge of Difficult Conversations 

Difficult conversations are one of the most challenging aspects of leadership. Many managers delay them because they fear confrontation or worry about losing staff. However, avoiding these conversations often allows problems to grow. Addressing issues early usually leads to better outcomes for both the individual and the team. 

 

Some practical techniques include: 

  • Giving the individual advance notice that the conversation may be challenging 
  • Providing specific examples rather than general criticism 
  • Demonstrating empathy and understanding 
  • Focusing on solutions and improvement rather than blame 

 

When handled well, even difficult conversations can strengthen relationships and clarify expectations. 

 

Managing Conflict Constructively

Conflict is often viewed negatively, but it is not always harmful. Healthy disagreement can lead to better ideas and improved decision-making. The real challenge arises when conflict becomes personal or unresolved. In these situations, external mediation can be extremely helpful. 

 

Workplace mediators provide a neutral environment where individuals can explain their perspectives and feel heard. The focus is not on deciding who is right or wrong but on understanding what has happened and identifying constructive ways to move forward. When people feel genuinely listened to, it can significantly reduce tension and restore working relationships. 

 

Building a Positive Team Culture

Strong team culture is built through consistent leadership behaviours. Managers should focus on: 

  • Encouraging open communication 
  • Ensuring everyone has an opportunity to contribute 
  • Addressing problems early rather than ignoring them 
  • Modelling the behaviours they expect from others 
  • Recognising the contributions of team members 

 

Body language, tone of voice and face-to-face communication also play an important role. While email has its place, many sensitive discussions are better handled in person or via phone or video, where tone and intention can be communicated more clearly. 

 

Generational differences and evolving expectations around work also require thoughtful leadership. Transparency, flexibility and clear behavioural standards can help teams navigate these changes effectively. As leadership specialist Joanna Gaudoin has noted, the goal is to make your team an asset rather than a burden

  

Final Thoughts

Managing people will always be complex. Every team is made up of individuals with different personalities, motivations and challenges. However, strong leadership practices, including clear communication, early intervention, regular feedback and investment in management capability, can significantly reduce the impact of difficult situations. 

 

By creating a culture where expectations are clear, conversations are open and accountability is shared, law firms can build engaged teams that support both individual development and long-term business success. 

 

Special thanks to Law Firm Ambition for this insightful webinar hosted by Andy Poole, with speakers Helen Kirk-BlytheHelen Manson, Joanna Gaudoin and Sophie Wardell for another informative session.    

Be sure to sign up to our newsletter for updates and information for the next webinar in September and the Law Firm Ambition Annual Conference taking place in Birmingham in March 2027.

Get in touch

Interested in a confidential chat?

If you are considering outsourcing your legal cashiering, or just want to find out how it works, our team is here to help.

Contact us
Back to Blogs
Cashroom provides expert outsourced account services for law firms including legal cashiering, management accounts and payroll services. Our mission is to fee lawyers from the complexities of legal accounting by supporting the industry with accurate management information and allowing lawyers to do what they do best – practice law.

We have been working with The Cashroom for the past eight years and it has been a fantastic relationship throughout. We use Cashroom for their expertise in legal cashiering, management accounts, payroll and VAT returns, and consistently receive a reliable, high quality service. Their team works brilliantly alongside our in-house team and delivers a secure, efficient and compliant finance function that supports our business as it continues to grow. Their flexible services, combined with a genuine personal touch, mean we have a finance function that fits our needs perfectly. Their processes work particularly well for our busy conveyancing team, helping us operate efficiently while maintaining the high standards our clients expect.”

Gareth Jones | Easthams Solicitors
Practice Manager

Strengthening Financial Resilience in Law Firms: Why Now Is the Time to Act

Guest blogger: Paul McCluskey

In recent years, the legal press has consistently highlighted concerns around the extent to which some law firms  overly rely on client account interest to supplement operating income. While this approach may previously have provided a degree of financial flexibility, recent developments, particularly those proposed in the Ministry of Justice reforms, have increased scrutiny of its sustainability. Against a backdrop of wider economic and regulatory pressure, firms are being encouraged to take a more structured and forward-looking approach to financial resilience.

Central to this is the need for firms to understand, monitor, and evidence the effectiveness of their financial controls. This is not simply a matter of good practice, but an expectation embedded within the regulatory framework governing legal services.

Regulatory Expectations and the SRA Code of Conduct

The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) Code of Conduct for Firms requires firms to operate in a financially responsible manner. Rule 2.4 places an obligation on firms to ‘actively monitor their financial stability and business viability’, ensuring that they can meet their regulatory obligations as they fall due.

This obligation reflects the SRA’s broader expectation that firms maintain a clear understanding of their income model and the risks associated with it. Where a firm’s financial position is overly influenced by volatile or externally determined income streams, such as client account interest, there is a greater risk of sudden financial disruption if market conditions or regulatory rules change.

From a regulatory perspective, the ability to evidence financial stability is as important as stability itself. Firms should therefore be able to demonstrate that appropriate controls are in place and that these controls are subject to ongoing review.

Understanding and Reducing Financial Reliance

Financial reliance on a limited or unstable income source can present challenges at both an operational and strategic level. When changes occur, whether regulatory, economic, or market-driven, firms that have not assessed the extent of this reliance may find themselves responding reactively, rather than managing risk in a planned and proportionate way.

A key step in reducing this reliance is developing a clearer understanding of the firm’s underlying operating income and the effectiveness of the financial controls that support it. This includes identifying areas where controls are strong, as well as those where further attention may be required.

In practice, this type of analysis can be difficult to prioritise. Senior leaders often balance governance responsibilities alongside fee-earning commitments, and financial oversight may be spread across multiple systems and reporting mechanisms. As a result, gaining a consolidated view of financial resilience can require considerable time and coordination.

The Value of Structured Self-Assessment

Structured self-assessment provides a practical way for firms to address these challenges. By encouraging focused reflection, it allows firms to identify potential gaps in financial controls and assess the extent of financial reliance without undertaking a full audit or detailed financial review.

The Financial Stability Scorecard has been designed to support this process. It offers a concise framework through which firms can assess key aspects of financial stability and control. The intention is not to replace existing governance arrangements or professional advice, but to complement them by providing a high-level snapshot that can inform further discussion and decision-making.

Importantly, the scorecard is intended to be constructive rather than critical. Its primary purpose is to support informed internal conversations and, where appropriate, engagement with advisers on how financial governance arrangements may be strengthened.

Efficient Use of Time and Resources

Time constraints are frequently cited as a barrier to effective financial monitoring. While firms recognise the importance of ongoing oversight, the practical demands of gathering data and producing detailed reports can limit how often such reviews take place.

The scorecard seeks to address this by providing a streamlined assessment that can be completed in approximately five minutes.

  • It does not require the input of confidential information.
  • Results are generated immediately, allowing firms to consider next steps without delay.

By reducing the time and resource burden associated with initial financial assessment, firms are better placed to engage in regular, proportionate review of their financial position. This approach supports both operational efficiency and effective risk management.

Supporting Governance and Regulatory Engagement

Firms that have used the scorecard report that it has assisted them in evidencing their financial controls and understanding areas for improvement. The outputs can be used to support internal governance discussions, inform strategic planning, and contribute to wider business considerations such as encouraging inward investment from prospective equity stakeholders. Results can also potentially enhance professional indemnity insurance submissions or funding applications.

From a regulatory standpoint, the ability to demonstrate that financial stability is actively monitored and reviewed supports compliance with SRA Code of Conduct paragraph 2.4 It also provides assurance that financial oversight is treated as an ongoing responsibility rather than a reactive exercise.

Access the Scorecard:  https://www.gemstonelegal.co.uk/financialstabilityscorecard

Conclusion

As regulatory expectations continue to evolve, law firms  to take a proactive and structured approach to financial management. Understanding financial reliance, identifying potential control gaps, and evidencing stability are essential elements of responsible firm governance.

Tools such as the Financial Stability Scorecard offer a practical means of supporting this process. By enabling efficient self-assessment and informed discussion, they help firms balance regulatory expectations with operational realities. In doing so, they support more sustainable decision-making and reduce the risk of unexpected financial pressure in the future.

Access the Scorecard:  https://www.gemstonelegal.co.uk/financialstabilityscorecard

About the Author

Gemstone Legal is an advisory firm specialising in financial and risk management support for law firms. The firm works with legal practices to address operational and financial challenges, with a focus on cash flow management, profitability, and regulatory compliance. As a Law Society-approved Lexcel assessor and an independent NACFB registered finance broker, Gemstone Legal supports firms in strengthening financial stability and governance arrangements, contributing to sustainable and well-managed growth.

https://www.gemstonelegal.co.uk

Interested in a confidential chat?

If you are considering outsourcing your legal cashiering, or just want to find out how it works, our team is here to help.

Contact us
Back to Blogs
Cashroom provides expert outsourced account services for law firms including legal cashiering, management accounts and payroll services. Our mission is to fee lawyers from the complexities of legal accounting by supporting the industry with accurate management information and allowing lawyers to do what they do best – practice law.

“I’ve been a client of Cashroom for over 10 years and couldn’t fault the service. When I started the firm, I had basic knowledge of compliance and bookkeeping but didn’t feel confident managing it myself. Cashroom took that weight off my shoulders and provided an invaluable resource I wouldn’t have been able to afford in-house.”

Mubasher Choudry
Mubasher Choudry
Mubasher Choudry Family Law Solutions

From Compliance to Confidence

Why Law Firms Are Embracing Outsourced Finance

Law firms face mounting pressures, stricter regulation, margins and a shortage of skilled professionals. With this in mind, many firms are asking what truly needs to sit in-house and what could be delivered more effectively by a specialist partner? 

Outsourced legal finance is no longer viewed as just another back-office support function. For a growing number of firms, it is becoming a core part of their operating model. As Chris O’Day, CEO of Cashroom, explains, the shift is being driven not just by efficiency, but by resilience, compliance confidence, and long-term strategic thinking. 

 

Q. We’re seeing huge shifts in how law firms run their operations. From your perspective, what’s driving the growing move towards outsourcing legal finance, and why is it becoming such an integral part of a modern firm’s setup?

A. If you strip it back, three things are driving it: regulation, margin pressure, and talent. 

Regulation around client money, reporting and audit has only become more demanding.  Regulators quite rightly expect firms to have tight controls, clear records and robust oversight of client funds. That’s hard to deliver consistently if you’re relying on one or two overstretched people in a back office. 

At the same time, most firms are under pressure to protect margin while improving client service. Partners are asking: “What genuinely has to be done in-house, and what can be delivered better by a specialist?” Legal finance is a natural candidate for that question. It’s essential, but it isn’t something clients see as a point of differentiation. If you can improve quality, resilience and cost all at once by outsourcing, it becomes a very sensible business decision. 

The third driver is people. There’s a real shortage of experienced legal cashiers, and firms struggle to recruit and retain the calibre of finance staff they need, especially outside major cities. Outsourcing gives access to a deeper pool of specialist expertise without the recruitment risk. 

For many modern firms, outsourced finance is now part of the core operating model. It gives them a finance function that looks and feels like an inhouse team, but with scale, cover, technology and compliance baked in. That frees partners to focus on strategy, client relationships and legal work, rather than worrying whether yesterday’s client account reconciliations were done. 

 

Q. Client-money handling is under more scrutiny than ever. How does The Cashroom help firms feel more confident about their compliance, accuracy, and audit readiness? And why is having an independent specialist so important in getting this right?

A. Client money is the thing that keeps most managing partners awake at night, and understandably so. The consequences of getting it wrong can be severe: regulatory sanctions, reputational damage, and in extreme cases, the loss of a practice.

Our starting point is to build a finance environment that is boringly predictable: daily reconciliations, segregation of duties, robust approval workflows, and a clear audit trail for every movement of client funds. Because we work with over 300 firms, we’ve seen almost every scenario, from sole practitioners and small high-street firms, through to high-volume conveyancing practices and large multi-office firms with complex structures. That experience flows into our processes and our portal. 

We design our controls around the relevant accounts’ rules – SRA, CLC, Law Society of Scotland and others and we keep a close eye on new guidance and thematic reviews. When something changes, we update the process once, and every client benefits. That’s hard for a single firm to replicate on its own. 

Independence is crucial. An external specialist brings separation between fee-earners asking for payments and the people authorising and processing them. Our teams are trained to challenge, ask for the right evidence, and say “no” or “not yet” where something doesn’t meet the standard. That constructive friction is a big part of good client-money governance.  

By the time an auditor arrives, everything they need is there; reconciliations, reports, approvals and notes, all in one secure system. For our clients, audits become less of a stressful event and more of a confirmation that the control environment is doing what it should. 

 

From Cost to Competitive Advantage 

This isn’t just a cost conversation. It’s about risk, control and sustainability. Firms remain responsible for their client money and regulatory compliance, that never changes. But how that responsibility is operationally delivered is evolving. The firms that are building finance functions that are structured and properly resourced, are the firms that are ready for audit at any time, not just when the auditor is due. 

With an increase in scrutiny and commercial pressure, “boringly predictable” finance processes are not a luxury. They are a competitive advantage. Outsourced legal finance is no longer a peripheral support service. For successful modern law firms, it is part of the foundation on which their sustainable growth has been built. 

 

About Chris O’Day

Chris O’Day is a Chartered Accountant, having qualified at Deloitte and has had a significant impact at Cashroom over the years since joining in 2014. After joining Cashroom as a Management Accountant, his extensive experience in legal accounting saw him become Cashroom’s Client Services Director in 2017 – gaining significant insight as to what is valuable to clients and to the legal industry, before taking on the CEO role in 2021 to drive the next phase of Cashroom’s growth. 

Chris finds endless opportunities and has a key focus on challenging the status quo in order to drive continuous improvement across the business and the services Cashroom provide to the Legal Sector. Chris believes that being client-centric is key to any service business – understanding what lawyers want and need and ensuring Cashroom deliver the best customer experience that is efficient, compliant and risk-free.

 

Learn how Cashroom can help your firm build a finance function that’s both secure and scalable.  

Contact Us

Interested in a confidential chat?

If you are considering outsourcing your legal cashiering, or just want to find out how it works, our team is here to help.

Contact us
Back to Blogs
Cashroom provides expert outsourced account services for law firms including legal cashiering, management accounts and payroll services. Our mission is to fee lawyers from the complexities of legal accounting by supporting the industry with accurate management information and allowing lawyers to do what they do best – practice law.

“I’ve been a client of Cashroom for over 10 years and couldn’t fault the service. When I started the firm, I had basic knowledge of compliance and bookkeeping but didn’t feel confident managing it myself. Cashroom took that weight off my shoulders and provided an invaluable resource I wouldn’t have been able to afford in-house.”

Mubasher Choudry
Mubasher Choudry
Mubasher Choudry Family Law Solutions

Privacy Settings
We use cookies to enhance your experience while using our website. If you are using our Services via a browser you can restrict, block or remove cookies through your web browser settings. We also use content and scripts from third parties that may use tracking technologies. You can selectively provide your consent below to allow such third party embeds. For complete information about the cookies we use, data we collect and how we process them, please check our Privacy Policy
Youtube
Consent to display content from - Youtube
Vimeo
Consent to display content from - Vimeo
Google Maps
Consent to display content from - Google